The purpose of this article was to examine historic institutional autologous stem cell mobilization practices and evaluate factors influencing mobilization failure and kinetics. In this retrospective study we analyzed clinical records of 1834 patients who underwent stem cell mobilization for autologous transplantation from November 1995 to October 2006 at the Washington University in St. Louis. Successful mobilization was defined as collection of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. From 1834 consecutive patients, 1040 met our inclusion criteria (502 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], 137 Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 401 multiple myeloma [MM]). A total of 976 patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 64 received G-CSF plus chemotherapy (G/C) for the initial mobilization. Although the median CD34(+) cell yield was higher in G/C group than in G-CSF alone group, the failure rates were similar: 18.8% and 18.6%, respectively. Overall, 53% of patients collected > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg during the first apheresis with either mobilization regimen. Regardless of mobilization regimen used, MM patients had the highest total CD34(+) cell yield and required less aphereses to collect > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Mobilized, preapheresis, peripheral blood CD34(+) count correlated with first day apheresis yield (r = .877, P < .001) and 20 cells/microL was the minimum threshold needed for a successful day 1 collection. For the remobilization analysis we included patients from the whole database. A total of 269 of 1834 patients underwent remobilization using G/C, G-CSF, and/or GM-CSF, and G-CSF plus plerixafor. Only 23% of remobilized patients achieved > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg and 29.7% failed to pool sufficient number of stem cells from both collections. Patients receiving G-CSF plus plerixafor had lowest failure rates, P = .03. NHL patients remobilized with G-CSF who waited > or =25 days before remobilization had lower CD34(+) cell yield than those who waited < or =16 days, P = .023. Current mobilization regimens are associated with a substantial failure rate irrespective of underlying disease. Patients who fail initial mobilization are more likely to fail remobilization. These findings suggest that there is a need for more effective first-line mobilization agents.
Despite the preferential use of EC in an older population, median OS and LRC rates were not significantly different for patients treated with EP for both LD and ED SCLC.
In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) may cause hypophosphatemia leading to osteomalacia due to renal phosphate wasting. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) may play a role in this setting. We present an HIV-infected patient with TDF-induced profound hypophosphatemia, Fanconi syndrome, osteomalacia, and bilateral hip fracture. Routine serum biochemistry was assessed by standard methods. The plasma FGF23 concentration was measured at Mayo Laboratories (Scottsdale, AZ, USA). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using a Hologic Discovery densitometer. At presentation, the patient's plasma C-terminal FGF23 was 2,760 reference units (RU)/mL (15 times upper limit of normal; reference interval [RI] ≤ 180 RU/mL), serum phosphate was 0.58 (RI 0.8-1.6 mmol/L), and TmPO4/GFR was 95%. DXA at the lumbar spine showed a Z score of -4.0. Vitamin D3 and oral phosphate were administered, and TDF was discontinued. After 4 months off TDF, lumbar spine BMD significantly increased by 12% (Z score -3.5); by 6 months the plasma C-terminal FGF23 declined to 1.8 times the upper limit of normal, and both urine and serum phosphate levels normalized. By its marked elevation and subsequent near normalization, FGF23 may be responsible for a component of the phosphate wasting syndrome in these patients. The time course of resolution was 6 months. As expected, with calcium, vitamin D, and phosphate management, BMD significantly improved with resolution of osteomalacia. Clinicians should be aware of this side effect of TDF and the time course of its resolution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.