Background Canine myocarditis can result from infection with bacteria Listeria monocytogenes.Case report A 14-week-old female entire Staffordshire Bull Terrier was assessed for lethargy, inappetence and dyspnoea. Radiographs and echocardiography revealed fluid within the pericardial space, a plaque of marked hyperechogenicity within the right ventricular free wall, marked right atrial dilation and myocardial systolic dysfunction. Histopathology of the myocardium was consistent with severe pyogranulomatous myocarditis, with gram stain revealing gram-positive bacilli, consistent with a Listerial infection. Bacterial culture of the myocardium yielded a light growth of Listeria monocytogenes. ConclusionTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of canine myocarditis caused by Listeria monocytogenes to be described and should be included as a differential diagnosis of myocarditis. Further, it prompts the consideration of potential zoonotic risks for veterinarians treating dogs with pericardial effusions.
Background Higher‐order multiple (HOM) pregnancies are associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity, especially consequent to preterm birth. Multi‐fetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) may be provided, though its benefits in prolonging gestation and improving neonatal outcomes must be weighed against its risks. Aims The aim was to compare outcomes of HOM pregnancies where expectant management was chosen (EM) with those where MFPR was provided. Methods The method involved a retrospective study of HOM pregnancies referred to a single quaternary hospital between 2007 and 2016. The primary outcome was gestational age. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage, nursery admission, hospital stay, Apgar scores, early fetal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death and composite fetal loss. Results Fifty‐seven pregnancies were eligible for inclusion. Median gestation at birth (weeks) was significantly higher for MFPR (35.3 vs 33.1, P < 0.01). Pregnancies after MFPR were less likely to lead to preterm birth (63.2 vs 100.0%, P < 0.001), half as likely to birth before 34 weeks (31.6 vs 60.0%, P = 0.09) but similarly likely to extremely preterm birth (<28 weeks, 8.6 vs 10.5%, P = 0.58). Miscarriage was more likely after MFPR (13.6 vs 0%, P = 0.05). EM neonates were more likely to be admitted to the nursery (P < 0.01) and have longer hospital stay (29.6 vs 20.2 days, P = 0.05); however, they had similar Apgar scores. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that MFPR is associated with an increase in gestational age, with a reduction by almost half of births before 34 weeks, but no difference in extremely preterm births; the latter represents the highest risk group. This should be used to guide management counselling for HOM pregnancies.
Introduction: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition, usually presenting with pelvic pain or infertility in women of reproductive age. Diagnosis is made on histopathology of deposits excised during laparoscopy, given diagnosis solely made by macroscopic examination can be challenging for even experienced gynaecological surgeons. Case description: A 45-year-old during laparoscopy for fibroids is found to have peritoneal deposits resembling endometriosis. Histopathology reveals multifocal metastatic grade 1 neuroendocrine tumour of the appendix. Conclusion: This incidental finding highlights the importance of thorough examination of the appendix and abdominal cavity for unexpected pathology during gynaecological laparoscopy. Incidental finding of appendiceal pathology at time of laparoscopy for endometriosis is not uncommon; however, the finding of metastatic malignancy is far rarer. While several case studies have reported severe endometriosis mimicking advanced stage cancer, this is the first documented occurrence of an advanced, metastatic tumour, mimicking endometriosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.