The majority of the Earth's terrestrial carbon is stored in the soil. If anthropogenic warming stimulates the loss of this carbon to the atmosphere, it could drive further planetary warming. Despite evidence that warming enhances carbon fluxes to and from the soil, the net global balance between these responses remains uncertain. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of warming-induced changes in soil carbon stocks by assembling data from 49 field experiments located across North America, Europe and Asia. We find that the effects of warming are contingent on the size of the initial soil carbon stock, with considerable losses occurring in high-latitude areas. By extrapolating this empirical relationship to the global scale, we provide estimates of soil carbon sensitivity to warming that may help to constrain Earth system model projections. Our empirical relationship suggests that global soil carbon stocks in the upper soil horizons will fall by 30 ± 30 petagrams of carbon to 203 ± 161 petagrams of carbon under one degree of warming, depending on the rate at which the effects of warming are realized. Under the conservative assumption that the response of soil carbon to warming occurs within a year, a business-as-usual climate scenario would drive the loss of 55 ± 50 petagrams of carbon from the upper soil horizons by 2050. This value is around 12-17 per cent of the expected anthropogenic emissions over this period. Despite the considerable uncertainty in our estimates, the direction of the global soil carbon response is consistent across all scenarios. This provides strong empirical support for the idea that rising temperatures will stimulate the net loss of soil carbon to the atmosphere, driving a positive land carbon-climate feedback that could accelerate climate change.

The global climate is noticeably warming, and drought occurs frequently. Therefore, choosing a suitable index for drought monitoring is particularly important. The standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) are commonly used indicators in drought monitoring. The SPEI takes temperature into account, but the SPI does not. In the context of global warming, what are their differences and applicability in regional drought monitoring? In this study, after calculating the SPI and SPEI at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month timescales at 102 meteorological stations in Inner Mongolia from 1981 to 2018, we compared and analyzed the performances of the SPI and SPEI in drought monitoring from temporal and spatial variations, and the consistency and applicability of the SPI and SPEI were also discussed. The results showed that (1) with increasing timescale, the temporal variations in the SPI and SPEI were increasingly consistent, but there were still slight differences in the fluctuation value and continuity; (2) due to the difference in time series, the drought characteristics identified by the SPI and SPEI were quite different in space at various timescales, and with the increase in timescale, the spatial distributions of the drought trends in Inner Mongolia were basically consistent, except in Alxa; (3) at the shortest timescale, the difference between the SPI and SPEI was the largest, and the drought reflected by the SPI and SPEI may be consistent at long timescales; and (4) compared with typical drought events and vegetation indexes, the SPEI may be more suitable than the SPI for drought monitoring in Inner Mongolia. It should be noted that the adaptability of the SPI and SPEI may be different in different periods and regions, which remains to be analyzed in the future.

No abstract