Simulation-based learning was associated with lower procedure related complications and should be an integral component in the teaching of procedural skills in Nephrology.
Increasing awareness and availability of tests for anti-PF4/heparin complex antibodies has raised concerns about indiscriminate testing and inappropriate diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A retrospective review of HITS testing at a large tertiary centre was performed to determine test patterns and incidence of HITS. Records of anti-PF4 tests over 4 years were reviewed. Positive results were matched against patient medical records and records of heparin utilisation for the diagnosis of HITS. Total of 33,308 patients (9.89 % of admissions) were exposed to at least 1 day of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Of 346 anti-PF4 antibody assays performed, 52 (15 %) were positive. Seventeen patients (4.9 % of total) were determined to have HITS. Of these, 13 cases (76 %) were patients who were initiated on haemodialysis via central venous catheters. Five patients (29 %) subsequently experienced thrombosis. The rate of HITS in patients given UFH was 0.33 %. HITS occurred in only one patient given LMWH. Of 1337 patients with chronic renal failure initiated on long term haemodialysis, the incidence of HITS was 0.97 %. Despite increased awareness of HITS, testing frequency remains conservative. An overwhelming majority of HITS cases were diagnosed among patients initiated on haemodialysis.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.