Background: Depressed neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) are at high risk for developing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Benefits and risk of endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous infants at birth, though widely practiced till recent have not been established. Objectives: To evaluate effect of endotracheal suctioning at birth on incidence of MAS, its severity and outcome among non-vigorous MSAF born infants. Methods: This randomized open level trial was conducted over one year period at a tertiary care teaching hospital. 155 non-vigorous infants (vigour assessed within 5-10 s of birth) were randomized to receive either endotracheal (ET) suctioning just after birth (n = 76) or no-endotracheal suction (n = 79). Subsequent resuscitation was performed as per neonatal resuscitation guideline. All infants were admitted for subsequent care and monitoring. Antenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal details; respiratory support; complications, hospital stay and outcome were recorded. Results: Incidence of respiratory distress due to MAS (with consistent chest radiology) was 41.3% and 57.1% [OR = 0.53(0.28to 1.01); p = 0.052], while non-MAS respiratory distress was 33.3% and 27.3% [OR = 1.69(0.81 to 3.54); p = 0.17] in ET suction and no-ET suction group, respectively. Severity of MAS in ET suction vs. no-ET suction group were mild:16.1%(5/31)vs15.9%(7/44); moderate:61.3%(19/31)vs65.9%(29/ 44) and severe:22.6%(7/31)vs18.2% (8/44). Respiratory support requirement including mechanical ventilation; its duration, and mortality were similar in both groups, however, hospital stay was shorter in ET suction group (9.91 ± 3.22vs. 11.17 ± 3.73 days; mean diff:−1.26(−3.36 to −0.17); p = 0.024). Conclusions: Endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants born through MSAF tends to decrease the incidence of MAS and duration of hospital stay, however, overall incidence of respiratory distress and mortality remain unchanged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.