Background: Structural competency is the trained ability to recognize how social, political, economic, and legal structures shape diseases and symptoms. Although structural competency has become an increasingly accepted framework for training and teaching, it usually has not addressed nursing students and has not included marginalized patients as trainers. Method: This article analyzes a structural competency training model for nursing students that includes five components: T heory, O bservations, L earning from patients, E ngagement, and R esearch (the TOLERance model). Results: The TOLERance model increases the understanding of the interrelation between the individual clinical level and the sociopolitical structural level. It encourages nursing students to actively engage in social, political, and policy issues that affect their patients' health and to advocate for policy change. Conclusion: The moral and professional commitment of nurses to their patients demands that they do not ignore the structural forces that are detrimental to their patients' health. The TOLERance model provides nursing students with skills and competencies that help them to fulfill this commitment. [ J Nurs Educ . 2020;59(8):425–432.]

Structural competency is the trained ability to discern and acknowledge how health care outcomes are shaped by larger political, social, economic, policy, and legal forces and structures. Although structural competency has become an increasingly known framework for training and teaching, especially in the United States, it has usually not been used in nursing and nursing education. Moreover, very little is known about how to implement structural competency programs in conflict zones. Due to depoliticization that often prevails in both the higher education system and the health care system, the political conflict and the structural violence that significantly impact people’s health are rarely discussed in these systems. This article examines the potential contribution of structural competency training programs for nurses and nursing students in conflict areas by analyzing a program that has emphasized the impact of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict on the health of Jerusalem’s Palestinian residents. The article explains how this program has challenged the denial and silencing of conflict-related sociopolitical issues. At the same time, this program has created heated disagreements and friction. We suggest that structural competency training programs that are adapted to the political context in question may help nurses become organic intellectual leaders and agents of social change for those whose voices are not heard.

No abstract

Background Emergency department (ED) crowding is an international phenomenon dependent on input, throughput, and output factors. This study aims to determine whether patterns of potentially unnecessary referrals from either primary care physicians (PCPs) or urgent care centers (UCCs) can be identified, thereby to reduce ED visits by patients who could be treated elsewhere. Literature from the United States reports up to 35% unnecessary referrals from UCCs. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients referred to an ED in Jerusalem by either their PCP or a group of UCCs with a full range of laboratory tests and basic imaging capabilities between January 2017 and December 2017. The data were analyzed to identify referrals involving diagnoses, specialist consultations, and examinations unavailable in the PCP’s office or UCC (e.g., ultrasound, CT, echocardiogram, or stress test); these referrals were considered necessary for completion of the patient work-up. If patients were evaluated by an ED physician and sent home after an examination or laboratory test available at least in the UCC, the referrals were considered potentially unnecessary. Results Significantly more referrals were made by PCPs than UCCs (1712 vs. 280, p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed for orthopedics, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology referrals (p = 0.039, p < 0.001, p = 0.003). A higher percentage of patients referred by PCPs had potentially unnecessary visits compared to patients referred by UCCs (13.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.005). Conclusion A robust UCC system may help further reduce potentially unnecessary visits (including complex patients) to the ED.

BackgroundClinicians must be aware of the structural forces that affect their patients to appropriately address their unique health care needs. This study aimed to assess the participation of global emergency medicine (GEM) fellowship programs in formal social determinants of health (SDH) and structural competency (SC) training to evaluate the existence and procedures of such programs.MethodsA cross‐sectional study conducted with a short, online survey with questions regarding the presence of curriculum focused on SDH, SC, educational metrics, and the desire for further formal training in this domain was sent to all 25 GEM fellowship directors through the Global Emergency Medicine Fellowship Consortium (GEMFC) email listserv.ResultsEighty percent (20/25) of GEM fellowship directors responded to the survey. All (20/20) of participating fellowship programs included SDH and SC training in their didactic curriculum, and eight of 20 (40%) programs offered similar training for faculty. Additionally, 19 of 20 (95%) of respondents indicated interest in an open‐source tool for emergency medicine (EM) fellowship training in SDH and SC.ConclusionsWhile multiple GEM programs offer formal training on SDH and SC, gaps exist regarding similar training for faculty. Additionally, there is a lack of metrics to determine fellows' comfort with the content of this training. As a majority of GEMFC programs requested, an open‐source tool would allow a uniform curriculum and measurement of EM fellowship training in SDH and SC.