Background The main mechanism of body temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat, attributable to vasodilation. Perfusion index (PI) obtained with a pulse oximeter helps to assess peripheral perfusion dynamics by detecting the change in peripheral vascular tone. This study aimed to examine whether preoperative toe PI could predict the decrease in core temperature induced by spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Methods Parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from September 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled in this single-center prospective cohort study. All parturients received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) with fentanyl (15 μg) intrathecally. A pulse oximeter probe was placed on the left second toe for continuous PI measurement. The 3 M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System placed over the right temporal region was used to record core temperature over time. We evaluated the association between the maximum core temperature decrease, which is the primary outcome, and the preoperative toe PI at operating room (OR) admission using a segmented regression model (SRM) and a generalized additive model (GAM). The maximum core temperature decrease was defined as the difference between core temperature at OR admission and minimum intraoperative core temperature. Results Forty-eight patients were evaluated. In the SRM, the slope for the association between the maximum core temperature decrease and the preoperative toe PI changed from 0.031 to 0.124 after PI = 2.4%. Likewise, with the GAM, there was a small core temperature decrease when preoperative toe PI was greater than 2.0 to 3.0%. Conclusions Low preoperative toe PI was associated with maternal core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Preoperative toe PI is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the early prediction of perioperative core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registry number: UMIN000037965).
Aims: Introduction: Spinal fusion surgery is often associated with severe postoperative pain. This study aimed to determine whether intravenous acetaminophen produces equivalent analgesic effects to flurbiprofen under fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after one-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Study Design: Rondomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesia, Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, Sasebo Japan, between October 2015 to March 2017. Methodology: We studied 75 patients who underwent one-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: Group A (n = 25), which received 15 mg/kg acetaminophen intravenously every 6 hr. Group F (n = 25), which received 1 mg/kg flurbiprofen intravenously every 8 hr; and Group C (n = 25), which received saline every 6 hr as the control. Urabe et al.; JAMMR, 28(11): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMMR.46982 2 Each drug was started from prior to skin closure to 24 hr after surgery. All patients received fentanyl at a fixed dose of 0.33 μg/kg/hr continuously after a bolus administration of 250 μg fentanyl. A bolus of 0.33 μg/kg of fentanyl was administered on demand by PCA (lockout interval 15 min). Postoperative pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 hr postoperatively and fentanyl consumption was recorded for 6 and 24 hr after surgery. The frequency of bolus fentanyl administration were also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in NRS scores among the 3 groups. Acetaminophen and flurbiprofen did not show opioid sparing-effects under fentanyl PCA. However, the frequency of fentanyl boluses were significantly less in group A than in group C. Conclusions: Acetaminophen may produce equivalent analgesic effects to flurbiprofen after onelevel lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Original Research Article
Background: The main mechanism of temperature decrease during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat, attributable to vasodilation. Perfusion index (PI) obtained with a pulse oximeter helps to assess peripheral perfusion dynamics by detecting changes in peripheral vascular tone. This study aimed to examine whether preoperative toe PI could predict spinal anesthesia-induced core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery.Methods: Parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from September 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled in this single-center prospective cohort study. All parturients received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) with fentanyl (15 µg) intrathecally. A pulse oximeter probe was placed on the left second toe for continuous PI measurement. The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System placed over the right temporal region was used to record core temperature over time. We evaluated the association between the maximum core temperature decrease, which is the primary outcome, and the preoperative toe PI at operating room (OR) admission using a segmented regression model (SRM) and a generalized additive model (GAM). The maximum core temperature decrease was defined as the difference between core temperature at OR admission and minimum intraoperative core temperature.Results: Forty-eight patients were evaluated. In the SRM, the slope for the association between the maximum core temperature decrease and the preoperative toe PI changed from 0.031 to 0.124 after PI = 2.4%. Likewise, with the GAM, there was a small core temperature decrease when preoperative toe PI was greater than 2.0% to 3.0%.Conclusions: A lower preoperative toe PI was associated with maternal core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Preoperative toe PI is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the early prediction of perioperative core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registry number: UMIN000037965).URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042953
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of the interaction between intravenous anesthetics and desflurane on the QT interval. Methods: Fifty patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery were included. The patients received 3 μg/kg fentanyl and were randomly divided into two groups: group P patients received 1.5 mg/kg propofol and group T patients received 5 mg/kg thiamylal 2 min after fentanyl injection. All patients received rocuronium and desflurane (6% inhaled concentration) after loss of consciousness. Tracheal intubation was performed 3 min after rocuronium injection. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), bispectral index score (BIS), and the heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval on a 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded before fentanyl injection (T1), 2 min after fentanyl injection (T2), 1 min after propofol or thiamylal injection (T3), immediately before intubation (T4), and 2 min after intubation (T5). Results: There were no significant intergroup differences in patient characteristics. BIS and MAP decreased after anesthesia induction in both groups. MAP values at T3, T4, and T5 in group T were higher than those in group P. HR did not change over time or differ between the groups. The QTc intervals at T4 and T5 in group T were longer than those at T1. In group P, the QTc interval at T3 was significantly shorter than that at T1. The QTc intervals at T3, T4, and T5 in group T were significantly longer than those in group P. Conclusions: A propofol injection could counteract the QTc interval prolongation during desflurane anesthesia induction. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry database reference number: UMIN000023707. This study was registered on August 21, 2016.
The perfusion index (PI) cutoff value before anesthesia induction and the ratio of PI variation after anesthesia induction remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between PI and central temperature during anesthesia induction, and the potential of PI in individualized and effective control of redistribution hypothermia. This prospective observational single center study analyzed 100 gastrointestinal surgeries performed under general anesthesia from August 2021 to February 2022. The PI was measured as peripheral perfusion, and the relationship between central and peripheral temperature values was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify baseline PI before anesthesia, which predicts a decrease in central temperature 30 minutes after anesthesia induction, and the rate of change in PI that predicts the decrease in central temperature 60 minutes after anesthesia induction. In cases with a central temperature decrease of ≥ 0.6°C after 30 minutes, the area under the curve was 0.744, Youden index was 0.456, and the cutoff value of baseline PI was 2.30. In cases with a central temperature decrease of ≥ 0.6°C after 60 minutes, the area under curve was 0.857, Youden index was 0.693, and the cutoff value of the PI ratio of variation after 30 minutes of anesthesia induction was 1.58. If the baseline PI is ≤ 2.30 and the PI 30 minutes after anesthesia induction is at least 1.58-fold the PI ratio of variation, there is a high probability of a central temperature decrease of at least 0.6°C within 30 minutes after 2 time points.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.