Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) has beenreported not only in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy, but also in a proportion of HBsAgnegative patients with HBc antibody and/or HBs antibody. Recently, rituximab-plus-steroid combination chemotherapy (R-CHOP, etc.) has been identified as a risk factor for HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative patients with malignant lymphoma. Prophylaxis with antiviral drugs is essential for preventing HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients, but there is little evidence on which to base the choice of drug or appropriate duration of prophylaxis. There are also few clinical data on HBsAg-negative patients and no established standard of care for such patients with HBV reactivation. Based on the limited number of previous reports, preemptive therapy, guided by serial HBV-DNA monitoring, is a reasonable strategy to prevent HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative patients. However, clinical evidence alone is insufficient for determining optimal frequency of HBV-DNA monitoring during and after chemotherapy, or for determining when to stop preemptive therapy for HBV reactivation. Thus, well-designed clinical trials should be carried out to investigate the efficacy and safety of such preemptive therapy. Additionally, assessment of viral factors such as HBV genotypes and gene mutations may assist in the development of strategies to prevent the occurrence of severe hepatitis. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of HBV reactivation after systemic chemotherapy including rituximab, and propose a management strategy for malignant lymphoma patients suffering from HBV reactivation.

No abstract

Monthly monitoring of HBV DNA is useful for preventing HBV reactivation-related hepatitis among B-NHL patients with resolved HBV infection following R-steroid-chemo (UMIN000001299).

The influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on prognosis and hepatic toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era is unclear. Thus, we analyzed 553 patients, 131 of whom were HCV-positive and 422 of whom were HCV-negative, with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP)-like chemotherapy. Survival outcomes and hepatic toxicity were compared according to HCV infection. The median follow-up was 31 and 32 months for patients who were HCV-positive and HCV-negative, respectively. HCV infection was not a significant risk factor for prognosis (3-year progression-free survival, 69% vs 77%, P ‫؍‬ .22; overall survival, 75% vs 84%, P ‫؍‬ .07). Of 131 patients who were HCV-positive, 36 (27%) had severe hepatic toxicity (grade 3-4), compared with 13 of 422 (3%) patients who were HCV-negative. Multivariate analysis revealed that HCV infection was a significant risk factor for severe hepatic toxicity (hazard ratio: 14.72; 95% confidence interval, 6.37-34.03; P < .001). An exploratory analysis revealed that pretreatment transaminase was predictive of severe hepatic toxicity. HCV-RNA levels significantly increased during immunochemotherapy (P ‫؍‬ .006). These results suggest that careful monitoring of hepatic function and viral load is indicated during immunochemotherapy for HCV-positive patients. (Blood. 2010; 116(24):5119-5125)

The IRE1α-XBP1 pathway, a key component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, is considered to be a critical regulator for survival of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Therefore, the availability of small-molecule inhibitors targeting this pathway would offer a new chemotherapeutic strategy for MM. Here, we screened small-molecule inhibitors of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation, and identified toyocamycin from a culture broth of an Actinomycete strain. Toyocamycin was shown to suppress thapsigargin-, tunicamycin- and 2-deoxyglucose-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing in HeLa cells without affecting activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) activation. Furthermore, although toyocamycin was unable to inhibit IRE1α phosphorylation, it prevented IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage in vitro. Thus, toyocamycin is an inhibitor of IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage. Toyocamycin inhibited not only ER stress-induced but also constitutive activation of XBP1 expression in MM lines as well as primary samples from patients. It showed synergistic effects with bortezomib, and induced apoptosis of MM cells including bortezomib-resistant cells at nanomolar levels in a dose-dependent manner. It also inhibited growth of xenografts in an in vivo model of human MM. Taken together, our results suggest toyocamycin as a lead compound for developing anti-MM therapy and XBP1 as an appropriate molecular target for anti-MM therapy.