The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. These guidelines present recommendations in response to 18 clinical questions concerning the preoperative diagnosis, indications, resection methods, curability assessment, and surveillance of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal cancers based on a systematic review of the scientific literature.

Duodenal endoscopic resection was feasible as a therapeutic procedure, but it should only be performed by highly skilled endoscopists because of its technical difficulty. Piecemeal resection by EMR is acceptable for small lesions, based on these excellent long-term outcomes.

Endoscopic resection is now a widely accepted treatment for early gastric cancer, having a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new endoscopic resection method developed in the mid1990s that facilitates en-bloc resection even in patients with large or ulcerative lesions difficult to resect using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, compared to EMR, ESD requires a longer procedure time and a higher level of technical expertise, in addition to having a slightly greater risk of complications. Endoscopists must be aware of not only the risk factors for, and incidence of, complications, but also how to effectively treat such complications. Perforation and bleeding are the major complications associated with gastric ESD. The perforation and delayed bleeding rates have been reported to range from 1.2% to 5.2% and 0% to 15.6%, respectively, and can usually be managed with appropriate endoscopic treatment. Immediate bleeding during gastric ESD is quite common and controlling such bleeding, which is primarily achieved by carrying out electrocautery, plays a critical role in the successful completion of ESD.

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used to treat patients with early gastric cancers (EGCs), including large and ulcerative lesions. Few published data exist on the long-term outcomes of this treatment with median follow-up periods of over 5 years; we therefore aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of EGC patients undergoing ESD. Methods A total of 1,956 consecutive patients with 2,210 EGC lesions at initial onset underwent ESD with curative intent at our hospital from 1999 to 2006. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 5-year survival of EGC patients undergoing curative ESD for absolute indications or for expanded indications. Results For the pathological curability, curative ESD for absolute indications, curative ESD for expanded indications of differentiated-type EGC, and curative ESD for undifferentiated-type EGC were achieved in 781, 713, and 43 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 83.3 months. Among the 1,537 patients, there were only two patients with recurrence, including one who developed a regional lymph node (LN) metastasis and one who developed a distant LN metastasis with local recurrence resulting in gastric cancer-related death. Seven died from metachronous gastric cancers. The 5-year rates of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and relative survival were 92.6, 99.9, and 105.0 %, respectively.Conclusions Based on the high rate of 5-year survival among EGC patients undergoing curative ESD for absolute indications or for expanded indications in the largest patient series with a median follow-up period of over 5 years, ESD could be employed as a standard treatment for EGC lesions.

The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society developed the Guideline for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer based on scientific methods. Endoscopy for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer has been acknowledged as a useful and highly precise examination, and its use has become increasingly more common in recent years. However, the level of evidence in this field is low, and it is often necessary to determine recommendations based on expert consensus only. This clinical practice guideline consists of the following sections to provide the current guideline: [I] Risk stratification of gastric cancer before endoscopic examination, [II] Detection of early gastric cancer, [III] Qualitative diagnosis of early gastric cancer, [IV] Diagnosis to choose the therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer, [V] Risk stratification after endoscopic examination, and [VI] Surveillance of early gastric cancer.