Background Integrating primary prevention into care pathways for older adults is a core strategy of healthy ageing, but evidence remains limited. We aimed to determine whether incorporating a multidomain intervention into primary health care could improve standard value-based health outcomes and quality of life.Methods For this Taiwan Integrated Geriatric Care (TIGER) study, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, we recruited community-dwelling outpatients aged 65 years or older with at least three chronic medical conditions. We excluded people with malignancies undergoing chemotherapy, people with a life expectancy of less than 12 months, or people who were insufficiently able to communicate with study staff. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to usual care or to the integrated multidomain intervention using block randomisation. The integrated multidomain intervention entailed 16 2-h sessions per year, comprising communal physical exercise, cognitive training, nutrition and disease education, plus individualised treatment by specialists in integrated geriatric care. The primary outcome was changes from baseline quality of life, based on 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Intervention effects were analysed per protocol using a generalised linear mixed model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03528005.
Both traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of heart failure leading to hospitalization in patients without a related history of heart failure.
IntroductionThis study aims to develop and validate an integrative intrinsic capacity (IC) scoring system, to investigate its associations with a wide spectrum of biomarkers and to explore the predictive value of the integrative IC score on 4-year mortality among community dwelling people aged 50 years and older.MethodsWe included 839 adults aged ≥50 years from the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) and randomly divided them into derivation and validation cohorts to develop the IC scoring system. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to weight each subdomain (locomotion, sensory, vitality, psychological, and cognition) of IC according to its association with impairments in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and to construct the integrative IC score. Age-related biomarkers and genetic markers were compared between IC groups by ordinal logistic regression. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between IC and mortality, and subgroup analysis was used to assess the robustness of the results among participants aged 60 years and older.ResultsA 12-score IC scoring system (AUROC = 0.83; Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test p = 0.17) was developed, and higher scores indicated better intrinsic capacity. High interleukin (IL)-6, high E-selectin, low serum albumin and low folate were significantly associated with low IC in the whole sample. However, high IL-6, low serum albumin, low folate, high allostatic load, and APOE ε4 genotype were significantly associated with low IC in those aged 60 years old and older. Compared to the high IC group, the low IC group was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.22–5.11, p = 0.01 for all participants; HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.03–4.64, p = 0.04 for participants aged 60 years and older).ConclusionsThe conceptually proposed IC can be easily transformed into a scoring system considering different weights of individual subdomains, which not only predicts mortality but also suggests different pathophysiologies across the life course of aging (inflammation, nutrition, stress, and ApoE4 genotype). An intervention study is needed using the composite IC score to promote healthy aging and determine the underlying pathophysiology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.