BackgroundPulmonary function tests (PFTs) are routinely performed in the upright position due to measurement devices and patient comfort. This systematic review investigated the influence of body position on lung function in healthy persons and specific patient groups.MethodsA search to identify English-language papers published from 1/1998–12/2017 was conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar with key words: body position, lung function, lung mechanics, lung volume, position change, positioning, posture, pulmonary function testing, sitting, standing, supine, ventilation, and ventilatory change. Studies that were quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention; compared ≥2 positions, including sitting or standing; and assessed lung function in non-mechanically ventilated subjects aged ≥18 years were included. Primary outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC, FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), functional residual capacity (FRC), maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax), maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), peak expiratory flow (PEF), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Standing, sitting, supine, and right- and left-side lying positions were studied.ResultsForty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The study populations included healthy subjects (29 studies), lung disease (nine), heart disease (four), spinal cord injury (SCI, seven), neuromuscular diseases (three), and obesity (four). In most studies involving healthy subjects or patients with lung, heart, neuromuscular disease, or obesity, FEV1, FVC, FRC, PEmax, PImax, and/or PEF values were higher in more erect positions. For subjects with tetraplegic SCI, FVC and FEV1 were higher in supine vs. sitting. In healthy subjects, DLCO was higher in the supine vs. sitting, and in sitting vs. side-lying positions. In patients with chronic heart failure, the effect of position on DLCO varied.ConclusionsBody position influences the results of PFTs, but the optimal position and magnitude of the benefit varies between study populations. PFTs are routinely performed in the sitting position. We recommend the supine position should be considered in addition to sitting for PFTs in patients with SCI and neuromuscular disease. When treating patients with heart, lung, SCI, neuromuscular disease, or obesity, one should take into consideration that pulmonary physiology and function are influenced by body position.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen (APAP) overdose depends on metabolic activation to a toxic reactive metabolite via hepatic mixed function oxidase. In vitro studies have indicated that APAP may also be cooxidized by prostaglandin H synthetase. The present experiments were designed to assess the possible contribution of hepatic prostaglandin synthesis to APAP toxicity. Adult fed male mice were overdosed with 400 mg APAP/kg. Liver toxicity was estimated by measurement of serum transaminases. Hypertonic xylitol or sodium chloride (2250 mOsm/l), administered intragastrically to stimulate prostaglandin synthesis, increased APAP toxicity. By contrast, the cyclooxygenase inhibiting drugs aspirin (at 25 mg/kg) and indomethacin (at 10 mg/kg) protected against APAP-induced toxicity. APAP kinetics were not affected by hypertonic xylitol or indomethacin, nor were hepatic glutathione levels in overdosed mice. Imidazole, a nonspecific thromboxane synthetase inhibitor, also protected overdosed mice. This drug prolonged hexobarbital sleeping time and prevented the depletion of hepatic glutathione that followed APAP intoxication. Thus, the data support the conclusion that APAP-induced hepatoxicity may be modulated not only by inhibition of cytochrome P450 mediated oxidation, but also by controlling hepatic cyclooxygenase activity.

No abstract