Background The results remain controversial with regards to the impact of serum uric acid on clinical outcomes from peritoneal dialysis population. The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of serum uric acid levels on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Methods Data on 9405 peritoneal dialysis patients from the Zhejiang Renal Data system were retrospectively analyzed. All demographic and laboratory data were recorded at baseline. The study cohort was divided into quintiles according to baseline uric acid level (mg/dL): Q1 (< 6.06), Q2 (6.06–6.67), Q3 (6.68–7.27) (reference), Q4 (7.28–8.03), and Q5 (≥8.04). Hazards ratio (HR) of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was calculated. Results Mean serum uric acid was 7.07 ± 1.25 mg/dL. During a median follow-up of 29.4 (range, 3.0 to 115.4) months, 1226 (13.0%) patients died, of which 515 (5.5%) died of cardiovascular events. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients in the middle uric acid quintile (Q3: 6.68–7.27) exhibited the highest patient and cardiovascular survival rates (log-rank test P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that, using Q3 as the reference, in the fully adjusted model, a higher uric acid level (Q4: 7.28–8.03, and Q5: ≥8.04) was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality (Model 3; Q4: HR, 1.335, 95% CI, 1.073 to 1.662, P = 0.009; Q5: HR, 1.482, 95% CI, 1.187 to 1.849, P = 0.001), but not with cardiovascular mortality. The adverse effect of higher uric acid level (≥7.28 mg/dL) on all-cause mortality was more prominent in groups such as male, hypoalbuminemia, normal weight, non-diabetes mellitus at baseline rather than in their counterparts respectively. Conclusions A higher uric acid level was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12986-019-0379-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundA number of studies have provided information regarding the risks and benefits of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I) combined with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) versus mycophenolic acid (MPA).MethodsMedline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing mTOR-I to MPA as the primary immunosuppressive regimen in combination with CNI were selected and meta-analyzed.ResultsEleven randomized controlled trials consisting of 4930 patients in total were included. No significant difference was observed in the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and patient death between the two groups. However, an increased risk of graft loss (relative risk (RR) = 1.20) and inferior graft function (creatinine clearance, weighted mean difference (WMD) = −2.41 μmol/L) were demonstrated in mTOR-I-treated patients. Patients treated with mTOR-I had a higher risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.32), dyslipidemia, proteinuria (RR = 1.79), peripheral edema (RR = 1.34), thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.97) and lymphocoele (RR = 1.80), but a lower risk of cytomegalovirus infection (RR = 0.40), malignancy (RR = 0.64) and leucopenia (RR = 0.43). There was no difference in diarrhea, anemia, urinary tract infection, polyoma virus infection and impaired wound healing when mTOR-I was compared with MPA.ConclusionsmTOR-I showed no particular superiority to MPA. Notably, mTOR-I had an increased risk of graft loss when combined with CNI, even when combined with a reduced dose of CNI. Therefore, the optimal dosage strategies for mTOR-I and CNI need to be further explored.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background/Aims: Studies on the risk factors and outcomes of peritonitis within the first 6 months in peritoneal dialysis patients are sparse. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with early-onset peritonitis (EOP) and its influence on patients’ technique survival and mortality. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study. A total of 483 patients who had at least one episode of peritonitis were enrolled and followed from March 1, 2002, to August 31, 2016, at our center. According to the time to first peritonitis, we divided patients into two groups: EOP (≤ 6 months, n=167) and late-onset peritonitis (LOP, >6 months, n=316). Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with EOP. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to examine the influence of EOP on clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 483 patients, 167 (34.6%) patients developed their first episode of peritonitis within the first 6 months. The EOP patient group had more male patients, a shorter time on peritoneal dialysis (PD), lower serum albumin levels at the time of PD initiation and a higher peritonitis rate (P<0.05). The EOP patient group had fewer infections with Gram-negative organisms (P=0.013) and more culture-negative peritonitis (P=0.014) than the LOP patient group for the first episode of peritonitis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that factors associated with EOP included male gender (odds ratio (OR) 1.920, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.272-2.897, P=0.002) and a low serum albumin level at the start of PD (OR 0.950, 95% CI 0.914-0.986, P=0.007). In the Cox proportional hazards model, EOP was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 2.766, 95% CI 1.561-4.900, P<0.001). There were no differences between EOP and LOP for technique failure. However, in continuous analyses, a negative correlation was observed between the time to first peritonitis and technique failure (HR 0.988, 95% CI 0.980-0.997, P=0.006). In the Spearman analysis, the time to first peritonitis was negatively correlated with the peritonitis rate (r=-0.573, P<0.001). Conclusion: Male gender and a low serum albumin level before PD were strongly associated with EOP. Additionally, EOP patients had a higher risk of poor clinical outcomes. More importantly, an early peritonitis onset was associated with a high peritonitis rate.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Abstract:To describe the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who are on peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. We performed a retrospective matched-cohort analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of 30 ADPKD patients with those of 30 non-diabetic patients who had bilateral small kidneys between July 1 2007 and July 31 2014. The patient groups were matched by age, gender, and time of PD initiation. There were no significant differences in the demographic or biochemical parameters, comorbid conditions, residual glomerular filtration rate, or Charlson comorbidity score at the beginning of PD. The median renal volume was 1315 ml for the ADPKD group and 213 ml for the control group. Patients with ADPKD had similar 3-year patient survival (90.6% versus 86.3%, P=0.807) and technique survival (89.2% versus 74.3%, P=0.506) compared with non-ADPKD patients. Also, there was no significant difference in the peritonitis-free survival between the ADPKD and control groups (P=0.22), and rates of peritonitis were similar (0.19 versus 0.21 episodes per patient-year, P=0.26). No differences were observed in the incidence of PD-related complications, such as hernia and dialysate leak. ADPKD is not a contraindication for PD, and a subgroup of ADPKD patients with relatively small kidney volume can be treated using PD.