The paper focuses on the evaluation of the impact associated with various geometrical and material properties on the overall acoustic performance of generic multi-layer thermo-acoustic sources. First, a generalized numerical framework is developed using a state-of-the-art thermo-acoustic emission model for multi-layered devices and is used to forecast the effects associated with different parameters (thickness, density, thermal conductivity, and specific heat capacity), based on a set of 65 536 simulated architectures. Then, the acoustic facility is designed, assembled, and instrumented, and the findings of the simulation campaign are validated against experimental measurements for 32 different samples, manufactured via various vacuum deposition techniques. The results of the experimental campaign corroborate the simulation's prediction and indicate that the variables that have the strongest impact on the thermo-acoustic performance are the thicknesses of the substrate and thermophone layers, as well as the backing's thermal conductivity. Finally, the experimental results are directly comparable with the simulation predictions and the deviation between the two values is within the limits of the experimental accuracy, with an average deviation of 12% (maximal divergence of 28%) and best absolute performance of [Formula: see text] when measured from a distance of [Formula: see text]. Overall, the findings provide an insight into the effect of analyzed properties and offer a set of tangible guidelines that can be applied in the future toward the design optimization process that can potentially result in higher-efficiency thermophone-on-substrate thermo-acoustic emitters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.