We have explored the regulation of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) activity in tissue repair by examining the interactions of Zf9/core promoter-binding protein, a Kruppel-like zinc finger transcription factor induced early in hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, with promoters for TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta receptors, types I and II. Nuclear extracts from culture-activated HSCs bound avidly by electrophoretic mobility shift assay to two tandem GC boxes within the TGF-beta1 promoter but minimally to a single GC box; these results correlated with transactivation by Zf9 of TGF-beta1 promoter-reporters. Zf9 transactivated the full-length TGF-beta1 promoter in either primary HSCs, HSC-T6 cells (an SV40-immortalized rat HSC line), Hep G2 cells, or Drosophila Schneider (S2) cells. Recombinant Zf9-GST also bound to GC box sequences within the promoters for the types I and II TGF-beta receptors. Both type I and type II TGF-beta receptor promoters were also transactivated by Zf9 in mammalian cells but not in S2 cells. In contrast, Sp1 significantly transactivated both receptor promoters in S2 cells. These results suggest that (a) Zf9/core promoter-binding protein may enhance TGF-beta activity through transactivation of both the TGF-beta1 gene and its key signaling receptors, and (b) transactivating potential of Zf9 and Sp1 toward promoters for TGF-beta1 and its receptors are not identical and depend on the cellular context.
Chromosomal translocations resulting in the expression of chimaeric transcription factors are frequently observed in tumour cells, and have been suggested to be a common mechanism in human carcinogenesis. Ewing sarcoma and related peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumours share recurrent translocations that fuse the gene EWSR1 (formerly EWS) from 22q-12 to FLI1 and genes encoding other ETS transcription factors (which bind DNA through the conserved ETS domain). It has been shown that transduction of the gene EWSR1-FLI1 (encoding EWS-FLI1 protein) can transform NIH3T3 cells, and that mutants containing a deletion in either the EWS domain or the DNA-binding domain in FLI1 lose this ability. This indicates that the EWS-FLI1 fusion protein may act as an aberrant transcription factor, but the exact mechanism of oncogenesis remains unknown. Because ETS transcription factors regulate expression of TGFBR2 (encoding the TGF-beta type II receptor, TGF-beta RII; Refs 9,14), a putative tumour suppressor gene, we hypothesized that TGFBR2 may be a target of the EWS-FLI1 fusion protein. We show here that Ewing sarcoma [corrected] (ES) cell lines with the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion have reduced TGF-beta sensitivity, and that fusion-positive ES cells and primary tumours both express low or undetectable levels of TGFBR2 mRNA and protein product. Co-transfection of FLI1 and the TGFBR2 promoter induces promoter activity, whereas EWSR1-FLI1 leads to suppression of TGFBR2 promoter activity and FLI1-induced promoter activity. Introduction of EWSR1-FLI1 into cells lacking the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion suppresses TGF-beta RII expression, whereas antisense to EWSR1-FLI1 in ES cell lines positive for this gene fusion restores TGF-beta RII expression. Furthermore, introduction of normal TGF-beta RII into ES cell lines restores TGF-beta sensitivity and blocks tumorigenicity. Our results implicate TGF-beta RII as a direct target of EWS-FLI1.
A 2.5-kilobase cDNA clone that encodes a 371-amino acid novel transcription factor was isolated from a human placenta cDNA library using a yeast one-hybrid system. The novel ets-related transcription factor (ERT) showed a homology with the ETS DNA-binding domain. Using constructs of the transforming growth factor- (TGF-) type II receptor (RII) promoter linked to the luciferase gene, we have demonstrated that ERT activates transcription of the TGF- RII gene through the 5-TTTCCTGTTTCC-3 response element spanning nucleotides ؉13 to ؉24 and multiple additional ETS binding sites between ؊1816 and ؊82 of the TGF- RII promoter. A specific interaction between ERT and the ETS binding sites was also demonstrated using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Deletion mapping of ERT protein suggests that the transactivation domain resides in the amino terminus while the DNA-binding domain is localized to the carboxyl-terminal region. Our results suggest that ERT might be a major transcription factor involved in the transcriptional regulation of the TGF- RII gene.
The epithelium-speci®c transcription factor, ERT/ESX/ ESE-1/ELF3, binds to the TGF-b RII promoter in a sequence speci®c manner and regulates its expression. In this study, we investigated whether ERT could regulate endogenous TGF-b RII expression in Hs578t breast cancer cells. Analyses of the Hs578t parental cell line revealed low RII mRNA expression and resistance to the growth inhibitory eects of TGF-b. Infection of this cell line with a retroviral construct expressing ERT induced higher levels of endogenous RII mRNA expression and protein expression relative to cells infected with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CATneo) as a control. Relative to control cells, the ERTneo-expressing Hs578t cells show approximately a 50% reduction in cell growth in the presence of exogenous TGF-b1, as well as a fourfold higher induction of activation in transient transfection assays using the 3TP-luciferase reporter construct. When transplanted into athymic mice, ERTexpressing Hs578t cells showed decreased and delayed tumorigenicity compared with control cells. This data strongly suggests that ERT plays an important role as a transcriptional activator of TGF-b RII expression, and that deregulated ERT expression may play a critical role in rendering Hs578t human breast cancer cells insensitive to TGF-b's growth inhibitory eects. Oncogene (2000) 19, 151 ± 154.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.