The present study aimed to assess the association between the severity of chronic periodontitis and the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers by investigating whether severe chronic periodontitis (CP), rather than mild CP, correlates with an increased risk of total or individual GI cancers.Adults (≥18 years) with mild and severe CP were identified from a random sample of 2 million insured patients in the National Health Insurance Research Database (2001–2010). After propensity score matching, 25,485 individuals, each with mild or severe CP, were included for comparison. The primary endpoint was the incidence of total or individual GI cancers, including cancers of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon/rectum, and pancreas. Cox proportional hazard models with the robust aggregated sandwich estimator were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) after adjusting for known risk factors.GI cancers occurred in 275 individuals with mild CP and 324 individuals with severe CP. After adjusting for known risk factors, severe CP was not associated with an increased risk of total GI cancer relative to mild CP (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84–1.16) or individual GI cancers, including esophageal (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.62–2.15), gastric (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.68–1.49), small intestinal (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.22–2.22), colorectal (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78–1.16), and pancreatic cancers (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.47–1.75).Severe CP was not associated with an increased risk of total or individual GI cancers when compared with mild CP.

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to identify the long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in treated periodontitis patients in Taiwan.MethodsFrom the National Health Insurance Research Database (2001-2010), adult patients (≥ 18 years) with treated periodontitis were identified. Comparison was made between patients with mild form and severe form of treated periodontitis after propensity score matching. The primary end point was the incidence of MACE.ResultsA total of 32,504 adult patients with treated periodontitis were identified between 2001 and 2010. After propensity score matching, 27,146 patients were preserved for comparison, including 13,573 patients with mild form and 13,573 patients with severe form of treated periodontitis. During follow-up, 728 individuals in mild treated periodontitis group and 1,206 individuals in severe treated periodontitis group had at least 1 MACE event. After adjustment for gender, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, severe treated periodontitis was associated with a mildly but significantly increased risk of MACE among older patients > 60 years of age (incidence rate ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.46). No association was found among younger patients ≤ 60 years of age.ConclusionsSevere form of treated periodontitis was associated with an increased risk of MACE among older Taiwanese patients, but not among younger Taiwanese patients. We should put more efforts on the improvement of periodontal health to prevent further MACE.

Two or more antihypertensive agents are required to achieve blood pressure control for the most hypertensive patients. However, comparison of clinical outcomes between fixed‐dose combinations (FDC) and free‐equivalent combinations of renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor and thiazide diuretic is lacking nowadays. Patients who were newly diagnosed with hypertension between July 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2011 and prescribed with FDC (n = 13 176) or free combinations of RAS inhibitors and thiazide diuretic (n = 4392) were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan and matched in 3:1 ratio using the propensity score method. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary end points were hospitalization of heart failure, new diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, and the initiation of dialysis. Compared with he FDC group was associated with better medication adherence compared with the free combination group. FDC of RAS inhibitor and thiazide diuretic reduced MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74‐0.97; P = 0.017), hospitalization for heart failure and initiation of dialysis compared with the free combination regimens. The outcome benefits of FDC was mainly driven by reduced cardiovascular and renal events in the patients with proportion of days covered <80%. In this retrospective claims database analysis, compared with the free combination regimens, the use of FDC of RAS inhibitor and thiazide diuretic was associated with improved medication compliance and clinical outcomes in the management of hypertension, particularly in the patients with poor medication adherence.

RV FAC correlates positively with RRp/RRpp and single-beat determination of RV function is feasible and accurate in patients with chronic AF.