This paper investigates the cyclic behavior of steel columns subjected to single‐sided cyclic loading protocols driven by residual deformations. First, nonlinear time‐history analyses are performed to steel framed structures using a set of repeated earthquakes. Then, based on the dynamic analysis results, a set of single‐sided loading protocols is developed to envelop the asymmetric seismic behavior of the examined frames. The developed protocols are used to identify the new single‐sided capacity margins of steel columns in terms of strength and ductility as well as evaluate the potential of using novel high‐strength materials. In this paper: (a) the new asymmetric loading protocols are proposed based on the seismic behavior of three medium‐rise frame buildings with different beam‐to‐column strength ratios (i.e. Mpc/Mpb) which are analyzed with the aid of the finite element analysis (FEA) software ABAQUS; (b) a computational databank of the inelastic responses of square tubular steel columns with high yield‐to‐tensile (YT) strength ratio is developed by subjecting column FEA models with various width‐to‐thickness ratio and axial loads to both conventional and asymmetric cyclic loading protocols. Due to the asymmetrical nature of the cyclic protocols, a lower post‐peak strength deterioration was observed in columns that enables the definition of new, extended, ductility capacity margins. The ductility capacity ratios under the asymmetric loading protocols were found to be 1.15 to 1.71 higher than those obtained under the conventional protocols enabling the use of high‐strength steels in steel columns of smaller width‐to‐thickness ratio.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.