Background Although the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recognised as a serious complication in patients with rheumatic disease (RD) receiving immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs), the incidence and risk factors for reactivation remain controversial. Objectives To investigate the incidence and risk factors for HBV reactivation in patients with RD. Methods We performed a multicentre, observational, prospective study over 2 years in patients with resolved HBV infection. Patients with RD treated with a dose of ≥5 mg/day prednisolone and/or synthetic or biological ISDs with negative HB virus surface antigen and positive anti-HB virus surface antibody (HBsAb) and/or anti-HB virus core antibody (HBcAb) were enrolled. Quantitative HBV DNA results and related data were regularly recorded. Results Among 1042 patients, including 959 with rheumatoid arthritis, HBV DNA was detected in 35 (1.93/100 person-years), with >2

Objective. To clarify the mode of inheritance and the genome origins of arthritis in a lupus-prone strain of mice, MRL/MpJ, bearing a Fas deletion mutant gene, lpr (MRL/lpr).Methods. Using non-lupus-prone strains of mice, C3H/HeJ-lpr/lpr (C3H/lpr), (MRL/lpr ؋ C3H/lpr)F 1 intercross and MRL/lpr ؋ (MRL/lpr ؋ C3H/lpr)F 1 backcross mice were prepared. Arthritis in individual mice was analyzed by histopathologic grading, and the genomic DNA of the backcross mice was examined by simple sequence-length polymorphism analysis to determine the polymorphic microsatellite markers highly associated with arthritis.Results. Arthritis-susceptibility loci with significant linkage were mapped between D15Mit111 and D15Mit18 (map position 17.8-18.7 cM) on chromosome 15 and between D19Mit112 and D19Mit72 (map position 43.0-55.0) on chromosome 19 (logarithm of odds scores 3.5 and 4.3, respectively). Three other loci, one mapped to each of chromosomes 1, 2, and 7, showed suggestive linkage. Loci homozygous for MRL alleles on chromosomes 1 and 19 enhanced arthritis in both sexes, whereas other loci on chromosomes 2 and 15 selectively affected males. A locus homozygous for MRL alleles on chromosome 7 inhibited arthritis in both sexes. Three of these loci were found to originate from an LG/J strain and 1 from an AKR/J strain. Some combinations of these loci showed an additive effect in a hierarchical manner on the development of arthritis.Conclusion. Arthritis in MRL/lpr mice is a complex pathologic manifestation resulting from the cumulative effect of multiple gene loci with an allelic combination derived from the original inbred strains.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic disorder characterized by synovial inflammation and subsequent destruction and deformity of synovial joints. The articular lesions start with synovitis, focal erosion of unmineralized cartilage, and then culminate in the destruction of subarticular bone by pannus tissue. Periarticular osteopenia and systemic osteoporosis follow as late complications of RA. Osteoclasts, specialized cells that resorb bone, play a central role in developing these osteolytic lesions. To elucidate the mechanism of osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction in autoimmune arthritis, we investigated the expression of RANK ligand (RANKL), RANK, and osteoprotegerin (OPG) mRNA in a mouse type II collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) model by in situ hybridization. The results indicated that most of the TRAP-positive mono- and multinucleated cells in the inflamed and proliferating synovium and in the pannus were RANK-positive authentic osteoclasts and their precursors. In the inflamed synovium and pannus of the mouse CIA model, synovial fibroblastic cells around these RANK-positive cells were strongly positive for RANKL. Moreover, RANKL-positive osteoblasts on the endosteal bone surface, at a distance from the affected synovial joints, increased significantly in the mouse CIA model prior to periarticular osteopenia and systemic osteoporosis. These data indicated that the RANKL-RANK system plays an important role for osteoclastogenesis in both local and systemic osteolytic lesions in autoimmune arthritis, and can therefore be a good target for therapeutic intervention.

IntroductionAlthough susceptibility genes for anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibodies (ACPA)-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been successfully discovered by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), little is known about the genetic background of ACPA-negative RA. We intended to elucidate genetic background of ACPA-negative RA.MethodWe performed a meta-analysis of GWAS comprising 670 ACPA-negative RA and 16,891 controls for 1,948,138 markers, followed by a replication study of the top 35 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using 916 cases and 3,764 controls. Inverse-variance method was applied to assess overall effects. To assess overlap of susceptibility loci between ACPA-positive and -negative RA, odds ratios (ORs) of the 21 susceptibility markers to RA in Japanese were compared between the two subsets. In addition, SNPs were stratified by the p-values in GWAS meta-analysis for either ACPA-positive RA or ACPA-negative RA to address the question whether weakly-associated genes were also shared. The correlations between ACPA-positive RA and the subpopulations of ACPA-negative RA (rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive and RF-negative subsets) were also addressed.ResultsRs6904716 in LEMD2 of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus showed a borderline association with ACPA-negative RA (overall p = 5.7 × 10−8), followed by rs6986423 in CSMD1 (p = 2.4 × 10−6) and rs17727339 in FCRL3 (p = 1.4 × 10−5). ACPA-negative RA showed significant correlations of ORs with ACPA-positive RA for the 21 susceptibility SNPs and non-HLA SNPs with p-values far from significance. These significant correlations with ACPA-positive RA were true for ACPA-negative RF-positive and ACPA-negative RF-negative RA. On the contrary, positive correlations were not observed between the ACPA-negative two subpopulations.ConclusionMany of the susceptibility loci were shared between ACPA-positive and -negative RA.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0623-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThe prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation assumes that hepatic injury after reactivation is often rapidly progressive and can evoke fulminant hepatitis. The incidence and prognosis of reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be different from those receiving organ transplantation and cancer chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical course of HBV reactivation and develop a scoring system for risk stratification in RA patients with resolved infection.MethodsHBV DNA was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and patient data were collected for 4 years in RA patients with resolved HBV infection who were treated with steroids or synthetic or biologic immunosuppressive drugs.ResultsAmong 1127 patients, HBV DNA was detected in 57 patients (1.65/100 person-years); none of the reactivated patients exhibited worsening of hepatic function. Multivariate logistical analysis revealed that age > 70 years and HB core antibody (HBcAb) positivity alone were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. HBV DNA ≥ 2.1 log copies/mL was observed in 15 patients (0.43/100 person-years); seven patients were treated with nucleic acid analogs (NAAs), whereas the remaining eight were observed without treatment. Among reactivated cases, 15 cases changed to HBV DNA-negative status spontaneously, whereas 24 cases remained HBV DNA positive < 2.1 log copies/mL during the observation period. We designed the following scoring system: HBV reactivation risk score = 1 × (age > 70 years) + 2 × (HBcAb positivity alone) + 1 × (treatment other than methotrexate monotherapy). This revealed that patients with the highest score had an odds ratio of 13.01 for HBV reactivation, compared to those with the lowest score.ConclusionsRapid progression and poor outcomes after HBV reactivation were not frequent in RA patients with resolved infection. Our new risk scoring system might be useful for screening and optimization of prophylactic treatment by distinguishing patients with significantly lower reactivation risk.