Background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) performed with the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study of 125 eyes of 125 treatment-naïve DME patients who received anti-VEGF injections at three consecutive monthly intervals as the loading phase. The changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS), and total injection numbers were compared between the two anti-VEGF agents. Results: Among 125 eyes, 26 eyes completed the treatment with the TAE regimen for 24 months (20.8%). Thirteen eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 70.9 ± 6.0 years) received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, and 13 eyes of 13 patients (65.9 ± 8.6 years) received 2 mg aflibercept. No significant differences were detected in the baseline demographics. At 24 months, BCVA was significantly improved in both groups; from 0.31 ± 0.19 to 0.10 ± 0.12 logMAR units for IVR and 0.41 ± 0.19 to 0.16 ± 0.28 logMAR units for IVA (p = 1.29 × 10−9). CRT was significantly reduced in both groups; 440.9 ± 69.3 to 307.5 ± 66.4 μm for IVR and 473.9 ± 71.5 to 317.8 ± 71.2 μm for IVA (p = 3.55 × 10−9). No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA, CRT in both groups, and the total injection numbers for 24 months (11.0 ± 1.2 for the IVA group and 12.0 ± 1.0 the IVR group). DRSS was significantly improved in both groups (p = 0.0004 for IVR and p = 0.009 for IVA). Conclusion: No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA or CRT and injection numbers between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen. These results indicate that the results of the treatment with both agents with the TAE regimen were equally effective, but only 20.8% of patients completed 24 months of continuous treatment with the TAE regimen. Synopsis: There are no significant differences regarding effectiveness between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen for DME eyes.

Purpose To investigate the outcomes of a suspension of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments in the eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods This was a retrospective study that examined eyes having no exudation for 48 weeks while undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF injections every 12 to 16 weeks. The rate and time of recurrences, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), number of visits, and reactivity to anti-VEGF were determined after the suspension of the anti-VEGF treatments. Results In 34 eyes of 34 patients, 17 eyes (50.0%) had a recurrence during the 24-month follow-up period. The median time of a recurrence was 10 months. The BCVA was maintained for 24 months after the suspension regardless of the development of any recurrences. In 41.7% of the eyes that resumed treatment, the duration of exudation suppression by the anti-VEGF therapy was shorter than 12 weeks during the 12 months after restarting the anti-VEGF treatments. There was a significant increase in the number of visits during the first year after beginning the suspension versus during the 1 year before the suspension (non-recurrence group; P = 0.007, recurrence group; P = 0.001). Conclusion Although one-half of the eyes had a recurrence within 24 months after a suspension of anti-VEGF treatment, the BCVA was maintained after a resumption of the anti-VEGF treatments. However, the number of hospital visits increases regardless of the recurrences and the lesion stability is altered by the anti-VEGF suspension. Clinicians should explain both the advantages and disadvantages of anti-VEGF suspension to nAMD patients.

No abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the response to the initial anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to treat diabetic macular edema (DME) is significantly correlated with the response to the third consecutive monthly injection of the same anti-VEGF agent. Methods: Seventy eyes with DME that were treated with an anti-VEGF agent (16 eyes with 1.25-mg bevacizumab, 35 eyes with 0.5-mg ranibizumab, and 19 eyes with 2.0-mg aflibercept) were studied. They were treated with three consecutive monthly injections of one of the three anti-VEGF agents. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR units) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at the baseline, 1 week after the initial injection, and 1 month after the third consecutive monthly injection. The changes of both values from the baseline 1 week after the initial injection (day 7) and 1 month after the third monthly injection were determined. The significance of the correlations between the BCVA and the CMT was determined. Results: The mean BCVA improved significantly for all three agents (0.38 ± 0.22 logMAR units at the baseline to 0.27 ± 0.25 logMAR units) after the three monthly injections (p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA). For all cases, a moderate but significant correlation was found between the BCVA at day 7 and 1 month after the third injection (r = 0.58, p < 0.01; Spearman’s rank correlation). No significant correlation was found for bevacizumab (r = 0.09, p = 0.73), moderate correlation was found for ranibizumab (r = 0.42, p < 0.05), and a strong correlation was found for aflibercept (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) between the BCVA at day 7 and at 1 month after the third injection. The mean CMT improved significantly for all three agents (481.9 ± 96.3 μm at the baseline to 364.1 ± 116.0 μm after the three monthly injections, p < 0.05), and a moderate correlation was found for the three agents between CMT at day 7 to that at one month after the third anti-VEGF injection (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). A moderate correlation was found for all three agents between CMT at day 7 to that at one month after the third anti-VEGF injection (r = 0.68 for bevacizumab, r = 0.41 for ranibizumab and r = 0.53 for aflibercept, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The significant correlations between the results on day 7 to that one month after the third anti-VEGF treatment for DME indicates that the long-term effects of anti-VEGF therapy can be predicted by the short-term response. In addition, the results indicate that there may be differences in the effectiveness between the three anti-VEGF agents.

This study’s goal is to determine the accuracy of a linear classifier that predicts the prognosis of patients with macular edema (ME) due to a branch retinal vein occlusion during the maintenance phase of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The classifier was created using the clinical information and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings obtained up to the time of the first resolution of ME. In total, 66 eyes of 66 patients received an initial intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF followed by repeated injections with the pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 12 months. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without good vision during the PRN phase. The mean AUC of the classifier was 0.93, and the coefficients of the explanatory variables were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was 0.66, BCVA at first resolution of ME was 0.51, age was 0.21, the average brightness of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was −0.12, the intactness of the external limiting membrane (ELM) was −0.14, the average brightness of the ELM was −0.17, the brightness value of EZ was −0.17, the area of the outer segments of the photoreceptors was −0.20, and the intactness of the EZ was −0.24. This algorithm predicted the prognosis over time for individual patients during the PRN phase.