Objective Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a numerical measure of erythrocyte size variation. It has been recently reported to be an independent prognostic marker of heart failure (HF). Previous studies on RDW were mostly designed for middle-aged and elderly patients (60-79 years old), therefore, there is no established limit for super-elderly patients (! 80 years old). The purpose of this study was to evaluate RDW as an effective tool to detect fatal HF in super-elderly patients. Methods The medical records and death certificates of 160 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology in Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center and who died from June 2002 to October 2010 were reviewed. The causes of death were reviewed, and the factors, including RDW, that might have been related to the fatal HF were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results HF was the major cause of death [52 patients (32.5%), 29 females, age 84.0±7.5 years], followed by pneumonia (18.8%, 30/160), and acute myocardial infarction (16.3%, 26/160). The most common cause of HF was atrial fibrillation (36.6%, 19/52), followed by hypertensive heart disease (19.2%, 10/52) and valvular disorders (17.3%, 9/52). The multivariate logistic regression analysis found that a high RDW (! 16.5%) was an independent factor related to fatal HF (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.10, 5.04, p=0.03). Conclusion HF was the major cause of death, and RDW ! 16.5 was significantly associated with fatal HF in super-elderly patients.

No abstract

Idiopathic bilateral atrial dilatation (IBAD) is an extremely rare anomaly and is usually associated with atrial fibrillation. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) have been shown to increase in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, secretion of ANP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with IBAD remains unclear. We investigated the clinical features of 9 patients with IBAD and 16 age- and sex-matched patients with lone atrial fibrillation (LAF). Plasma levels of ANP and BNP were measured, and echocardiographic parameters were followed. Left (LAV) and right atrial volumes (RAV) were significantly higher in patients with IBAD than in patients with LAF (both p < 0.01). There were no differences between patients with IBAD and LAF in other echocardiographic parameters. The percent increases in LAV and RAV in patients with IBAD exceeded those in patients with LAF (both p < 0.01). Plasma levels of BNP and the BNP/ANP ratios in patients with IBAD were significantly higher than those in patients with LAF (both p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in plasma levels of ANP. Regarding the clinical course of the patients with IBAD compared with those with LAF, the atrial volume increased gradually, and plasma levels of BNP were significantly higher. These findings suggested that IBAD was not only influenced by long-term atrial fibrillation, but also by subclinical left ventricular dysfunction.

Background: A previous study reported that amlodipine retarded coronary plaque progression in patients with coronary artery disease. The goal of this multicenter study was to determine which calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) other than amlodipine attenuated the progression of plaque volume (PV) accessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods and Results:ALPS-J was a prospective, randomized open-label study conducted at 5 centers. Patients who had hypertension and were scheduled for coronary intervention were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 16 mg/day of azelnidipine or 5 mg/day of amlodipine administered for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change in coronary PV measured by IVUS. Between 2007 and 2009, 199 patients were enrolled; 115 had evaluable IVUS images at both baseline and after 48 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure significantly reduced to 128/68 mmHg at follow-up. The lipid profiles in the 2 groups were comparable (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 97 mg/dl). The %change in PV showed a significant regression of −4.67 and −4.85% in the azelnidipine and amlodipine groups, respectively. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference in %change PV between the 2 groups (0.18%, 95% confidence interval −4.62 to 4.98%) did not exceed the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 6.525%.Conclusions: ALPS-J demonstrated that azelnidipine was not inferior to amlodipine for primary efficacy. In addition to standard medical therapy, dihydropyridine CCBs will retard PV progression in hypertensive patients. (Circ J 2011; 75: 1071 - 1079

No abstract