No abstract

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 8 levels of the perfusate were elevated during EVLP. Although adverse effects of these inflammatory cytokines were anticipated, removal of inflammatory cytokines by the adsorbent membrane did not improve lung function during prolonged EVLP. Factors other than the cytokines may play a major role in causing lung injury during EVLP. Further research is needed to investigate the real mechanism of lung graft injury during prolonged EVLP and to establish longer EVLP duration for graft treatment. This strategy could contribute to the salvage of potentially damaged lungs, especially from cardiac death donors, and to expansion of the donor pool.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cf-DNA) has been shown to be an informative biomarker of rejection after lung transplantation (LT) from deceased donors. However, in living-donor lobar LT, because small grafts from blood relatives are implanted with short ischemic times, the detection of dd-cf-DNA might be challenging. Our study was aimed at examining the role of dd-cf-DNA measurement in the diagnosis of primary graft dysfunction and acute rejection early after living-donor lobar LT. Immediately after LT, marked increase of the plasma dd-cf-DNA levels was noted, with the levels subsequently reaching a plateau with the resolution of primary graft dysfunction. Increased plasma levels of dd-cf-DNA were significantly correlated with decreased oxygenation immediately (p = 0.022) and at 72 hours (p = 0.046) after LT. Significantly higher plasma dd-cf-DNA levels were observed in patients with acute rejection (median, 12.0%) than in those with infection (median, 4.2%) (p = 0.028) or in a stable condition (median, 1.1%) (p = 0.001). Thus, measurement of the plasma levels of dd-cf-DNA might be useful to monitor the severity of primary graft dysfunction, and plasma dd-cf-DNA could be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of acute rejection after LT.

No abstract

The differences in chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) between livingdonor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) and cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT) remain unclear. We conducted this study to compare the impact of CLAD on the outcomes after LDLLT vs. CLT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the data of 97 recipients of bilateral lung transplantation, including 51 recipients of LDLLT and 46 recipients of CLT. Results: The CLAD-free survival and overall survival after LDLLT were similar to those after CLT. CLAD and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS), but not bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), developed significantly later after LDLLT than after CLT (p = 0.015 and p = 0.035). Consequently, patients with CLAD and RAS, but not those with BOS, after LDLLT had a significantly better overall survival than those after CLT (p = 0.037 and p = 0.0006). Furthermore, after the diagnosis of CLAD, the survival of patients with RAS after LDLLT tended to be better than that after CLT (p = 0.083). Conclusion: CLAD, especially RAS, appears to develop later after LDLLT than after CLT and seems to have a lower impact on the overall survival after LDLLT than that after CLT.