Background The safety and efficacy of an oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment and the difference between direct OACs (DOACs) and warfarin in nonsevere frail elderly patients with AF are unclear. Methods This was a retrospective and observational study of 354 patients over 80 years of age with nonsevere frailty who were diagnosed with AF and treated with OACs. Nonsevere frailty was defined as a clinical frailty scale score of <7. Bleeding and thromboembolic events during the OAC treatment were followed up. Results Of 354 patients enrolled, 273 (77.1%) received DOACs and 81 (22.9%) received warfarin. Of 273 patients receiving DOACs, there were 210 (76.9%) prescribed with appropriate doses of DOACs. Of 81 warfarin‐treated patients, 53 (65.4%) were prescribed an appropriate dose of warfarin. During a follow‐up of 33.1 (14.0‐51.0) months, 15 patients (1.5/100 person‐years) had bleeding events and 10 (1.0/100 person‐years) had thromboembolic events while on an OAC treatment. The incidence ratio of bleeding events in patients receiving DOACs was lower than that in those receiving warfarin (1.0/100 person‐years vs 2.9/100 person‐years, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07‐0.91, P = .036). There was no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolic events between the DOAC and warfarin treatment groups (0.88/100 person‐years vs 1.4/100 person‐years, HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.16‐2.57, P = .52). Conclusions OACs are substantially safe and effective for preventing thromboembolic events in nonsevere frail patients over 80 years of age. Particularly, DOACs can be used more safely than warfarin.

Catheter ablation is currently an established treatment for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We focused on elderly patients with a high prevalence of AF and attempted to identify the clinical factors associated with unsuccessful ablation outcomes. Among 735 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation procedures, 108 (14.7%, 66 men) aged !75 years were included. Of them, 80 had paroxysmal AF, and the remaining 28 non-paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and occasionally additional ablation. When AF recurred, redo ablation procedures were performed if the patient so desired. The mean number of ablation procedures was 1.1 ± 0.4 times per patient. During a mean follow-up of 38.7 ± 21.7 months, sinus rhythm was maintained in 100 patients (92.6%) without any antiarrhythmic drugs, but not in the remaining 8 (7.4%). Left atrial diameter (LAD, P < 0.001), left ventricular (LV) systolic diameter (P < 0.001), LV diastolic diameter (P = 0.001), non-PV AF foci (P = 0.036), and diabetes (P = 0.045) were associated with unsuccessful ablation procedures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a large LAD and non-PV AF foci were significant independent predictors of AF recurrences, with odds ratios of 0.76 (P = 0.019) and 0.04 (P = 0.023), respectively. In a total of 124 procedures, one major (0.8%) and 11 minor (8.9%) complications occurred. In elderly AF patients, catheter ablation of AF is effective and safe. Non-PV AF foci and a large LAD were independent clinical predictors of unsuccessful AF ablation outcomes.

Intracardiac defibrillation (IDF) is performed to restore sinus rhythm (SR) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate the change in the IDF threshold before and after RFCA during the ablation procedure and determine whether the IDF threshold after RFCA was associated with the AF substrate and AF recurrence. A total of 141 consecutive patients with drug-refractory persistent AF (age 62.5 ± 10.3 years, 84.4% male) were enrolled in this study. Before RFCA, we initially performed IDF with an output of 1 J. When IDF failed to restore SR, the output was gradually increased to 30 J. After RFCA, we attempted pacing-induced AF to provoke other focuses of AF. When AF was induced, we performed IDF again to terminate AF with outputs of 1 to 30 J. The change in the IDF threshold to restore SR before and after RFCA was evaluated. After RFCA, the IDF threshold for restoring SR significantly decreased (from 11.5 ± 8.6 J to 4.0 ± 3.8 J, P < 0.001). During the follow-up (24.3 ± 12.2 months), SR was maintained in 107 patients (75.9%). The multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that an IDF threshold of > 5 J after RFCA was significantly associated with the AF recurrence (HR, 3.99; 95% confidence interval 1.93-8.22; P = 0.0001). RFCA decreased the IDF threshold for restoring SR in patients with persistent AF. The IDF output of > 5 J after RFCA could be a predictor of AF recurrence independent of the AF substrate.

No abstract

No abstract