The essential contribution of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to carcinoma progression is the loss of their epithelial characters, gain of mesenchymal marker expression, acquisition of migration, invasive activity and capability to pass through the basement membrane. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of EMT regulator Snail, a zinc finger transcription factor, in human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC). Most OESCC cell lines expressed epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin and claudin-1 and -7; however, TE-8 (Snail-positive) cells expressed mesenchymal marker vimentin but not E-cadherin and claudins. Transduction of ectopic Snail in TE-15 (Snail-negative) cells diminished expression of these epithelial adhesion molecules with promotion of cell migration, invasion and proliferation as well as the shift from cobblestone-like appearance to spindle morphology. In OESCC tissue samples, immunohistochemical analyses revealed that the nuclear Snail expression at the invasive front was correlated with the high levels of vimentin expression (p = 0.0061), which was conversely associated with reduced expressions of E-cadherin (p = 0.023), claudin-1 (p = 0.0246) and claudin-7 (p = 0.0161). Interestingly, elevated Snail expression at the invasive front of the OESCC was associated with higher incidence of lymphatic (p = 0.0143) and venous vessels invasion (p = 0.0029), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0074) and clinicopathological tumour stage (p = 0.0057). According to the expressions of epithelial and mesenchymal markers, the tumours were subclassified into three groups, the epithelial-type OESCC and the complete or incomplete EMT-type OESCCs. Snail-positive tumours were frequently categorized into the complete- or incomplete-type EMT phenotypes. Our present results suggest the significance of Snail-associated EMT in the progression of OESCC. Snail-induced EMT at the invasive front of the OESCC can be a novel marker for the prediction of metastasis.

According to the expression of gastric (claudin-18) and intestinal claudins (claudin-3 and claudin-4), the authors have previously proposed a new phenotypic classification of gastric carcinoma (GC): the gastric (G-CLDN), intestinal (I-CLDN) and unclassified claudin (U-CLDN) phenotypes. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of Cdx2, the caudal-related transcription factor, on the regulation of intestinal claudins expression in vitro and in vivo. It was confirmed on immunohistochemistry that nonneoplastic gastric mucosa with intestinal metaplasia (IM) expressed Cdx2 with increased levels of intestinal claudin expression. In addition, Cdx2 expression was detected in 28 (30%) of 94 GC at the invasive front. Interestingly, Cdx2 expression had a significant association with the I-CLDN phenotype (P < 0.001), which was almost identical to the established gastric and intestinal mucin-based GC classification. Furthermore, the transfection of a recombinant human CDX2-expressing vector into TMK-1 (Cdx2-negative) GC cells specifically elevated the expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 at the mRNA (CLDN3, 3.9-fold; CLDN4, 2.8-fold) and protein levels (claudin-3, 8.6-fold; claudin-4, 9.8-fold), whereas no induction of the other claudins was detected. These findings suggest that Cdx2 plays an important role in the regulation of intestinal claudin expression not only in gastric mucosa with IM but also GC.

Approximately half of the patients treated with GPT for inoperable pancreatic cancer exhibited radiation-induced ulcers in the stomach and duodenum.

Mosapride has a preventive effect on occurrence of pneumonia in patients receiving gastrostomy feeding.

There are various types of snares for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Some endoscopists may choose the snare according to their feeling, but we supposed that there were some physical reasons behind each choice. In this paper, we raise the questions, ‘What is the best snare chosen for EMR?’, and ‘Why do we have to do it?’. From the theory of dynamics, we thought that the most important element was vertical force, which we could add against mucosa through the snare. First, we made two situations; one was keeping horizontal faced position of loop of snare (we defined it as HPW; horizontal faced position weight), and the other was rising up position of it (we defined it as RPW). We inspected these forces for the representative and different seven snares, and calculated the ‘Effective Range’, which was a RPW minus a HPW in average. The results demonstrated that both the spiral snare and the smaller ‘Snare Master’ showed higher than other snares in HPW, RPW, and the Effective Range. Based on our study, we judged them as the most adequate snares for EMR in physics and logicality.