These results have shed light on understanding of the pathogenesis of decreased corneal sensitivity in eyes with PEX syndrome. PEX syndrome is probably a binocular condition for which keratopathy of the fellow eye also requires observation.
Age and the degree of VF damage were related to future progression. Average IOP was not related to the progression rate; however, fluctuation of IOP was associated with faster progression, although this was not the case when average IOP was below 15 mm Hg.
Aim: To determine whether thermography can be used to evaluate bleb function. Methods: The surface temperatures of filtering blebs from 39 eyes of 33 post-trabeculectomy patients were measured using thermography. We introduced a new parameter: the temperature decrease in the filtering bleb (TDB) where TDB = (mean temperature of the temporal and nasal bulbar conjunctiva)-(temperature of the filtering bleb). The eyes were classified into good and poor intraocular pressure (IOP) control groups according to the patients' postoperative IOP. The morphological appearance of the filtering blebs were classified by slit-lamp images according to the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. The differences in TDB were analysed statistically. Results: Mean overall scores were as follows. The TDB were 0.54 (SD 0.20)uC and 0.21 (SD 0.18)uC for the good and poor IOP control groups, respectively. The difference between the TDB of the two IOP control groups was significant (p,0.0001), but there was no significant relationship between morphological classification and TDB. Conclusions: Thermographic measurements suggest that functional blebs have lower temperatures than nonfunctional blebs, and their morphological appearances are not affected by their temperature. Thermography may be useful for the evaluation of bleb function.
BackgroundTo investigate the success rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors that may affect the success rate of eye drop instillation were also evaluated.DesignA prospective, observational study.ParticipantsSeventy-eight glaucoma patients and 85 non-glaucoma volunteers were recruited in this study.MethodsOpen angle glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers were asked to video record their procedures of eye drop instillation using a 5-mL plastic bottle of artificial tear solution. Success of eye drop instillation was judged on video based on the first one drop of solution successfully applied on the cornea, by two investigators.Main outcome measuresSuccess rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients and non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors related to success rate of eye drop instillation, such as visual field defect and clinical characteristics, were also analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsNo significant deference in mean age was observed between two groups (glaucoma: 64.5 ± 14.4 years, non-glaucoma: 60.9 ± 14.1 years, P = 0.1156). Success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower (P = 0.0215) in glaucoma patients (30/78; 38.5%) than in non-glaucoma volunteers (48/85; 56.5%). The most frequent reason of instillation failure in glaucoma patients was touching the bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, eyelid or eyelashes with the tip of the bottle (29.5%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified lower corrected visual acuity (VA) (≤ 1.0; odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04–0.93, P = 0.0411), lower mean deviation (MD) (< -12 dB; OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.86, P = 0.0307) and visual field defect (VFD) in the inferior hemifield (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.34, P < 0.001) to be significantly related to instillation failure in glaucoma patients.ConclusionsSuccess rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower in glaucoma patients than in non-glaucoma volunteers. Corrected VA ≤ 1.0, MD < -12 dB and/or VFD in the inferior hemifield may be related to failure of eye drop instillation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.