The effects of cilostazol, a dual inhibitor of type 3 phosphodiesterase and adenosine uptake, on ion currents were investigated in pituitary GH(3) cells and pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. In whole-cell configuration, cilostazol (10 microm) reversibly increased the amplitude of Ca(2+)-activated K(+) current [I(K(Ca))]. Cilostazol-induced increase in I(K(Ca)) was suppressed by paxilline (1 microM) but not glibenclamide (10 microm), dequalinium dichloride (10 microM), or beta-bungarotoxin (200 nM). Pretreatment of adenosine deaminase (1 U/ml) or alpha,beta-methylene-ADP (100 microM) for 5 h did not alter the magnitude of cilostazol-stimulated I(K(Ca)). Cilostazol (30 microM) slightly suppressed voltage-dependent l-type Ca(2+) current. In inside-out configuration, bath application of cilostazol (10 microM) into intracellular surface caused no change in single-channel conductance; however, it did increase the activity of large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) (BK(Ca)) channels. Cilostazol enhanced the channel activity in a concentration-dependent manner with an EC(50) value of 3.5 microM. Cilostazol (10 microM) shifted the activation curve of BK(Ca) channels to less positive membrane potentials. Changes in the kinetic behavior of BK(Ca) channels caused by cilostazol were related to an increase in mean open time and a decrease in mean closed time. Under current-clamp configuration, cilostazol decreased the firing frequency of action potentials. In pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, cilostazol (10 microM) also increased BK(Ca) channel activity. Cilostazol-mediated stimulation of I(K(Ca)) appeared to be not linked to its inhibition of adenosine uptake or phosphodiesterase. The channel-stimulating properties of cilostazol may, at least in part, contribute to the underlying mechanisms by which it affects neuroendocrine function.

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been found to stimulate proliferation and migration of human gastric carcinoma cells. Whether the HGF-induced responses are correlated with the expressed level of HGF receptors or the changes of ionic currents is not clear. The present study investigated the effects of HGF on the proliferation and ionic currents of two human gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines, which were found to express different amounts of HGF receptor. Results showed that HGF induced a dose-dependent growth stimulation and accelerated cell cycle progression in SC-M1 cells. In patch clamp study, HGF treatment induced an outward K+ current and increased the slope conductance at -80 mV from 110+/-15 pS/pF to 207+/-15 pS/pF. The HGF-induced K+ current was abolished when tetraethylammonium chloride was added in bathing solution or a low Ca2+ solution was included in the recording pipette. Furthermore, HGF (10 ng/ml) induced an oscillatory Ca2+-activated K+ current with a lag period of 5+/-3 min in SC-M1 cells. In contrast, HGF did not induce mitogenesis, cell cycle progression and changes in ionic currents in KATO-III cells, although this cell line expressed a higher level of HGF receptors than SC-M1 cells did. These findings provide evidence that the activity of Ca2+-activated K+ channel may be involved in the HGF-induced cell proliferation in human gastric cancer cells, but it did not correlate with the density of HGF receptors.