No abstract

BACKGROUND:The combination of increased parity and shorter breastfeeding duration might increase the odds of the least differentiated triple-negative breast cancer (BC) phenotype, theoretically because an expanded progenitor cell population from each pregnancy would incompletely differentiate postpartum. METHODS: Subjects consisted of a consecutive case series of 2473 women treated for invasive breast cancer between 2001 and 2006. Breast cancer phenotype (triple-negative BC, vs non-triple-negative BC) was compared with reproductive and demographic information. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of breastfeeding duration (months per child) and parity with triple-negative BC were calculated after adjusting for ethnicity, age at menarche, family history, and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared with non-triple-negative BC, triple-negative BC was associated with shorter duration of breastfeeding per child (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97) and with higher parity (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.20). By using multivariate logistic regression, triple-negative BC was independently associated with higher parity ( 40 years vs >60 years). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with invasive breast cancer, higher parity and the absence or short duration of breastfeeding were independently associated with triple-negative BC. Any duration of breastfeeding was found to be associated with lower probability of triple-negative BC, and the odds of this phenotype decreased with increasing duration of breastfeeding. Cancer 2010;116:4933-43.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating condition associated with a number of chemotherapeutic agents. Drugs commonly implicated in the development of CIPN include platinum agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib, and thalidomide analogues. As a drug response can vary between individuals, it is hypothesized that an individual's specific genetic variants could impact the regulation of genes involved in drug pharmacokinetics, ion channel functioning, neurotoxicity, and DNA repair, which in turn affect CIPN development and severity. Variations of other molecular markers may also affect the incidence and severity of CIPN. Hence, the objective of this review was to summarize the known biological (molecular and genomic) predictors of CIPN and discuss the means to facilitate progress in this field.

Background Cancer pain is complex, and despite the introduction of the WHO cancer pain ladder, few studies have looked at the prevalence of adjuvant medication use in an inpatient palliative medicine unit. In this study, we evaluate the use of adjuvant pain medications in patients admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit and whether their use affects pain scores or opiate dosing. Methods In this retrospective observational study, patients admitted to the inpatient palliative care unit over a 3-month period with a diagnosis of cancer on opioid therapy were selected. Data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, oral morphine dose equivalent of the opioid at the time of discharge, adjuvant analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and pain scores as reported by nurses and physicians were collected. Results Seventy-seven patients were eligible over a 3-month period, out of which 65 (84 %) were taking an adjuvant medication. The most commonly prescribed adjuvant was gabapentin (70 %). Fifty-seven percent were taking more than one adjuvant. There were more women in the group receiving adjuvants (57 vs. 17%, p=0.010). Those without adjuvants compared with those on adjuvants did not have worse pain scores on discharge as reported by physicians (0.8±0.8 vs. 1.0±0.7, p=0.58) or nurses (2.0±2.7 vs. 2.1±2.6, p=0.86). There was no difference in morphine equivalent doses of the opioid in both groups (median (min, max); 112 (58, 504) vs. 200 (30, 5,040)) at the time of discharge; 75-80 % of patients had improvement in pain scores as measured by a two-point reduction in numerical rating scale (NRS). Discussion This study shows that adjuvant medications are commonly used for treating pain in patients with cancer. More than half of study population were on two adjuvants or an adjuvant plus NSAID along with an opioid. We did not demonstrate any benefit in terms of improved pain scores or opioid doses with adjuvants, but this could reflect confounding variables and physician choice. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the opioid-sparing effects of adjuvants. Conclusion Adjuvant agents are used in over 80 % of those treated for cancer pain.