ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and series of meta-analyses on the association between HIV-related stigma and health among people living with HIV.Data sourcesA structured search was conducted on 6 electronic databases for journal articles reporting associations between HIV-related stigma and health-related outcomes published between 1996 and 2013.Study eligibility criteriaControlled studies, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies in people living with HIV were considered for inclusion.Outcome measuresMental health (depressive symptoms, emotional and mental distress, anxiety), quality of life, physical health, social support, adherence to antiretroviral therapy, access to and usage of health/social services and risk behaviours.Results64 studies were included in our meta-analyses. We found significant associations between HIV-related stigma and higher rates of depression, lower social support and lower levels of adherence to antiretroviral medications and access to and usage of health and social services. Weaker relationships were observed between HIV-related stigma and anxiety, quality of life, physical health, emotional and mental distress and sexual risk practices. While risk of bias assessments revealed overall good quality related to how HIV stigma and health outcomes were measured on the included studies, high risk of bias among individual studies was observed in terms of appropriate control for potential confounders. Additional research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms behind the negative relationship between stigma and health to better inform interventions to reduce the impact of stigma on the health and well-being of people with HIV.ConclusionsThis systematic review and series of meta-analyses support the notion that HIV-related stigma has a detrimental impact on a variety of health-related outcomes in people with HIV. This review can inform the development of multifaceted, intersectoral interventions to reduce the impact of HIV-related stigma on the health and well-being of people living with HIV.
In experimental research a scientific conclusion is always drawn from the statistical testing of hypothesis, in which an acceptable cutoff of probability, such as 0.05 or 0.01, is used for decision-making.However, the probability of committing false statistical inferences would considerably increase when more than one hypothesis is simultaneously tested (namely the multiple comparisons), which therefore requires proper adjustment. Although the adjustment for multiple comparisons is proposed to be mandatory in some journals, it still remains difficult to select a proper method suitable for the various experimental properties and study purposes, especially for researchers without good background in statistics. In the present paper, we provide a brief review on mathematical framework, general concepts and common methods of adjustment for multiple comparisons, which is expected to facilitate the understanding and selection of adjustment methods.
Purpose BRAF V600E is a potentially highly targetable mutation detected in a subset of pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs). Its biologic and clinical effect within this diverse group of tumors remains unknown. Patients and MethodsA combined clinical and genetic institutional study of patients with PLGGs with long-term follow-up was performed (N = 510). Clinical and treatment data of patients with BRAF V600E mutated PLGG (n = 99) were compared with a large international independent cohort of patients with BRAF V600E mutated-PLGG (n = 180).Results BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 69 of 405 patients (17%) with PLGG across a broad spectrum of histologies and sites, including midline locations, which are not often routinely biopsied in clinical practice. Patients with BRAF V600E PLGG exhibited poor outcomes after chemotherapy and radiation therapies that resulted in a 10-year progression-free survival of 27% (95% CI, 12.1% to 41.9%) and 60.2% (95% CI, 53.3% to 67.1%) for BRAF V600E and wild-type PLGG, respectively (P , .001). Additional multivariable clinical and molecular stratification revealed that the extent of resection and CDKN2A deletion contributed independently to poor outcome in BRAF V600E PLGG. A similar independent role for CDKN2A and resection on outcome were observed in the independent cohort. Quantitative imaging analysis revealed progressive disease and a lack of response to conventional chemotherapy in most patients with BRAF V600E PLGG. ConclusionBRAF V600E PLGG constitutes a distinct entity with poor prognosis when treated with current adjuvant therapy. response to therapy and clinical outcome is still not known. As a result, as far as nonsurgical treatment is concerned, all patients with PLGGs receive similar treatment independent of their tumor's molecular alterations. 6 For deeply located tumors, such as hypothalamic/chiasmatic LGGs, the need for biopsy before treatment decisions are made for these children is still debated.The BRAF V600E mutation, which is observed in a variety of adult 7 and pediatric neoplasms, is thought to be present in only a small percentage of PLGGs.8 Controversy still exists as to whether BRAF V600E-mutant PLGG constitutes a unique subgroup with respect to natural history and outcome. 9,10 We have previously reported that PLGGs that transform to high-grade gliomas have a high incidence of BRAF V600E mutations in combination with CDKN2A deletion.11 CDKN2A is a tumor suppressor gene and a key regulator of the cell cycle. CDKN2A alterations act as a secondary hit, which allows for escape from cell cycle regulation and malignant behavior in multiple cancer types. 12,13 In PLGGs, CDKN2A loss has been reported to be associated with escape from oncogene-induced senescence, 14 especially when combined with BRAF mutations.To better define the clinical significance of BRAF V600E in these tumors, we performed a combined clinical and genetic analysis in an institutional discovery cohort of patients with PLGG who were diagnosed and treated in southern Ontario. 15 We then asse...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.