The stem-first technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate and consistent control of the CA value and thus is expected to improve the surgical outcome.

No abstract

Kerboull-type acetabular support rings (KT) and allogenic bone graft were used for severe periacetabular bone loss with primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this case–control study is to evaluate the risk factors related to poor outcomes of surgery. Sixty patients underwent primary THA and revision THA using allogenic bone graft with KT for large acetabular deficiency. These patients were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively and followed-up by radiograph. The minimum follow-up period was 4 years and averaged 7 years. A radiological failure was defined by the following criteria: substantial migration defined as change in the angle of inclination of more than 5 degrees or migration of more than 5 mm, breakage of the screw or device, acetabular revision due to aseptic loosening. Expected risk factors were defined as female, age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >25%, medical history of hypertension, renal failure, liver steatosis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiac infarction, smoking, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) classification III or IV, bleeding>500 mL, time of surgery >3hours, high hip center-type KT, inclination of KT >45 degrees, screw angle >25 degrees, morselized bone graft, Kawanabe's classification stage 3 or 4 and revision surgery. Nineteen hips (31.6%) revealed radiological failure according to our criteria, and revision THA was performed in 2 hips (3.3%). In the statistical analysis, morselized bone graft and high hip center-type KT were identified as factors of poor outcomes of surgery.

Implant positioning is one of the critical factors influencing postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several studies have reported that the postoperative antetorsion (AT) measurement for the femoral stem inserted without navigation showed wide variability. The current authors developed a simple instrument, the Gravity-guide (G-guide), for intraoperative assessment of stem AT and adjustment. They evaluated the effectiveness of the G-guide with postoperative computed tomography (CT) examination. Ninety patients (96 hips) who underwent primary THA using the G-guide for stem adjustment were evaluated. The G-guide consists of 2 parts: one attached to the lower leg and the other attached to the handle of the rasp. The G-guide was used to evaluate the AT at the time of inserting the final rasp. In addition, the AT value in the G-guide evaluation system required correction by the angle obtained in the preoperative epicondylar view. Intraoperative stem AT was defined as the sum of the intraoperative G-guide value and the correction angle. Postoperative AT was evaluated by CT examination. The discrepancy between the intra- and postoperative measurements was 4.6°±4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with discrepancy of less than 5° and 10° was achieved in 66 (69%) hips and 85 (89%) hips, respectively. The use of the G-guide could effectively reduce the variability of stem anteversion compared with manual adjustment. This study proved the effectiveness of the newly developed G-guide system in intraoperative stem AT adjustment.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), combined anteversion (CA), the sum of cup anteversion (AV) and stem antetorsion (AT) are used as parameters to assess the appropriateness of overall prosthetic alignment. In this study, we evaluated the CA value based on the post-operative computed tomography (CT) measurements in our patient population who underwent THA using the OrthoPilot™ image-free navigation system (B/BRAUN-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). During surgery, cup alignment was adjusted with the use of the navigation system while the positioning of the femoral stem was arbitrarily adjusted by the surgeon. Seventy-nine THAs were included in the study. Post-operative CT assessment for the prosthetic alignment showed the average cup inclination and AV values to be 40.5°±4.1° and 20.6°±4.6°, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of the navigation system by small values of standard deviation. By contrast, the AT value measured for the stem showed wide variability (mean 23.6°±11.2°). Consequently, the resulting CA was also inconsistent (mean 44.4°±11.2°) and only 61 of the 79 THAs (77.2%) were defined as satisfactory.