Differences in levels of environmentally induced memory T cells that cross-react with donor MHC molecules are postulated to account for the efficacy of allograft tolerance inducing strategies in rodents versus their failure in nonhuman primates and human transplant patients. Strategies to study the impact of donor-reactive memory T cells on allografts in rodents have relied on the pre-transplant induction of memory T cells cross-reactive with donor allogeneic MHC molecules through recipient viral infection, priming directly with donor antigen, or adoptive transfer of donor-antigen primed memory T cells. Each approach accelerates allograft rejection and confers resistance to tolerance induction, but also biases the T cell repertoire to strong donor-reactivity. The ability of endogenous memory T cells within unprimed mice to directly reject an allograft is unknown. Here we show a direct association between increased duration of cold ischemic allograft storage and numbers and enhanced functions of early graft infiltrating endogenous CD8 memory T cells. These T cells directly mediate rejection of allografts subjected to prolonged ischemia and this rejection is resistant to costimulatory blockade. These findings recapitulate the clinically significant impact of endogenous memory T cells with donor reactivity in a mouse transplant model in the absence of prior recipient priming.
Several protocols allow the successful ABO incompatible living-related kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKTWe compared the patient and graft survival rates as well as the incidence rate of acute rejection in these two eras, when different regimens were used. There were significant differences in the 1-and 5-year graft survival rates between groups 1 and 2 (1-year: 78% in group 1 vs. 94% in group 2; 5-year: 73% in group 1 vs. 90% in group 2, p = 0.008). Also, a higher incidence rate of acute rejection was significantly observed in group 1 (50/105, 48%) than in group 2 (18/117, 15%) (p < 0.001). We conclude that the FK/MMF combination regimen provides excellent graft survival results in ABO-ILKT.
All contributing authors have declared that there is no relationship with any companies and no conflict of interest in this study.Numerous studies have shown that protocol biopsies have predictive power. We retrospectively examined the histologic findings and C4d staining in 89 protocol biopsies from 48 ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) transplant recipients, and compared the results with those of 250 controls from 133 ABO-compatible (ABO-C) transplant recipients given equivalent maintenance immunosuppression. Others have shown that subclinical rejection (borderline and grade I) in ABO-C grafts decreased gradually after transplantation. In our study, however, subclinical rejection in the ABO-I grafts was detected in 10%, 14% and 28% at 1, 3 and 6-12 months, respectively. At 6-12 months, mild tubular atrophy was more common in the ABO-C grafts whereas the incidence of transplant glomerulopathy did not differ between the two groups (ABO-C: 7%; ABO-I: 15%; p = 0.57). In the ABO-I transplants, risk factors for transplant glomerulopathy in univariate analysis were positive panel reactivity (relative risk, 45.0; p < 0.01) and a prior history of antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk, 17.9; p = 0.01). Furthermore, C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries was detected in 94%, with diffuse staining in 66%. This deposition, however, was not linked to antibody-mediated rejection. We conclude that, in the ABO-I kidney transplantation setting, detection of C4d alone in protocol biopsies might not have any diagnostic or therapeutic relevance.
The patients in Group II showed excellent results similar to Group I. These results suggest that the low dose of rituximab (200 mg/body) is the sufficient dose in ABO-i kidney transplantation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.