To cite this article: P. T. P. Clifford & S. J. M. McCartin (1985) Effects of pre-harvest treatment and mower and header types on seed loss and hard seed content at mowing, recovery, and separation when harvesting a white clover seed crop, New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 13:4, 307-316, DOI: 10.1080/03015521.1985 Abstract A preliminary on-farm survey of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) crop seed losses at pickup for threshing and separation indicated that operator skills and/or machinery were responsible for losses rather than crop management skills. Losses ranged from 12 to 39%, the mean being 200 kg/ha of which 130 kg/ha was hard seed. In subsequent seasons at Lincoln, losses resulting from crop condition at mowing (crops were either cut green or desiccated before cutting morning or afternoon) were measured after cutting by a standard sickle bar (17 fingers/m), a lespedeza bar (25 fingers/m), a double reciprocating knife, or a twindrum rotary mower. The latter 2 mowers were also assessed in an out-of-condition crop. Losses from mowing ranged from 17 to 59% of the total harvestable seed yield (200-540 kg/ha). Use ofa rotating-finger type pickup attachment for swath recovery for threshing reduced mowing losses by 10% to range from 60 to 340 kg/ha. Lowest losses (5%) were recorded on a desiccated crop cut in the morning with a double reciprocating knife mower. The rotary mower gave the highest losses under good harvesting conditions for all treatments, but performed better than the double reciprocating knife on out-of-condition crops. Threshing and separation losses range from 20 to 200 kg/ha. Increase in pickup width tended to further concentrate losses in the header offal. The overall range of offal trail + pickup losses (460-720 kg/ha) indicated that some form of recovery would be practical. Hard seed content of seed lost both at mowing and at crop pickup for threshing ranged from 60 to 71 % -a hard seed return to the soil for the crop pickup process of 40-210 kg/ha. The drastic reduction in hard seed content which occurred in the threshing and separation processes was more than offset when this loss was restricted to the limited distribution of the offal trail and its associated recovery loss. The overall hard seed return in this area ranged from 160 to 420 kg/ha. These results indicated an urgent need for improved harvesting technology (a) to reduce seed loss and (b) to reduce hard seed content of the fraction remaining.
This paper reports on a pilot project that enabled end-user patrons to submit their own interloan requests.
PurposeEnd‐user requesting in New Zealand remains a relatively new phenomenon. The National Library of New Zealand has conducted two separate pilot projects with different institutions. This paper aims to consider the differences between the two projects and looks at the trends that emerged.Design/methodology/approachThe pilot projects occurred over similar timeframes, 12 months apart. Each used a different interface from which end‐users submitted their requests. The projects aimed to test workflow processes and ascertain the impacts for end‐users and library staff. System impacts and maintenance requirements, how the results would feed into best practice guidelines, and recommend future developments were also considered.FindingsThis paper details the different user responses elicited during the evaluation processes. A large proportion of end‐users in both projects confirmed that they would use this method of request creation again. The results confirm that end‐user requesting does work in a utility environment.Practical implicationsBoth projects continue in production with differing levels of involvement. The Lincoln University project continues following a redevelopment of the request screens based on what end‐users identified as important to them. The Landcare Research project continues with a more low key approach as the National Library of New Zealand considers the future developments required to enhance the end‐user experience and product up‐take in New Zealand.Originality/valueThis paper is of value to interloan librarians and especially those in an academic environment. It provides a compact case study where a national electronic utility provides the main platform for interlending and document supply in one country.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.