Paclitaxel-induced cardiac ischemia is a rare but life-threatening complication. Although it may be difficult to distinguish from hypersensitivity or infusion reactions, it should not be overlooked. We herein report a rare case of ST-segment elevation following the administration of paclitaxel for uterine cervical cancer and review the literature regarding paclitaxel-induced cardiac ischemia.A 48-year-old woman with uterine cervical cancer with no cardiovascular risk factors was admitted to our hospital for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and planned to receive weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for a total of 5 weeks. Just after the completion of the first cycle of paclitaxel infusion, she presented with diaphoresis and her consciousness level decreased. Electrocardiography showed ST elevation, suggesting acute myocardial infarction. Laboratory testing revealed troponin I positivity. Emergency coronary angiography (CAG) revealed a normal coronary artery, suggesting paclitaxel-induced vasospasm. After CAG, the patient was hemodynamically stable and was returned to the gynecologic unit two days after CAG. CCRT without paclitaxel was continued and the patient was uneventfully discharged from hospital.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to investigate the association between perioperative serum creatinine change and delayed urologic complications following total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign indications. Materials and Methods: A total of 510 cases (503 cases without delayed urologic injuries and 7 cases with delayed urologic injuries) in which TLH was performed for benign indications were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between patients with and without delayed urologic injuries. Laboratory markers (serum creatinine level at the preoperative and postoperative periods, white blood cell [WBC] ratio, and C-reactive protein [CRP] ratio) were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these laboratory markers. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in age, parity, body mass index, the presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative GnRH agonist use, previous history of abdominal surgery or the performance of adnexal surgery, ASRM score, the presence of cul-de-sac obliteration, operative time, blood loss or weight of the resected specimens between the two groups. The proportions of patients who showed an elevated creatinine level on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the delayed urologic injury group (9.9% vs. 57%, P < 0.001). The combination of the three laboratory markers yielded an area under the ROC curve value of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.491–1) in the detection of delayed urologic injuries. Conclusion: A change in the serum creatine level over baseline after surgery may indicate the possibility of urologic injuries. The combination of creatinine change and other factors, such as WBC or CRP would be helpful for detecting urologic complications after TLH.

No abstract

No abstract