Background: Acute cerebral infarction (ACI) includes cardiogenic ACI treated with anticoagulants and atherosclerotic ACI treated with antiplatelet agents. The differential diagnosis between cardiogenic and atherosclerotic ACI is still difficult. Materials and Methods: The plasma sCLEC-2 and D-dimer levels were measured using the STACIA system. Results: The plasma sCLEC-2 level was significantly high in patients with ACI, especially those in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI, and plasma D-dimer levels were significantly high in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma levels of sCLEC-2 and the sCLEC-2/D-dimer ratios in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI were significantly higher than those in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma D-dimer levels in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI were significantly lower than those in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma levels of sCLEC-2 and the sCLEC-2/D-dimer ratios were significantly higher in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI or acute myocardial infarction in comparison to patients with cardioembolic ACI or those with deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Using both the plasma sCLEC-2 and D-dimer levels may be useful for the diagnosis of ACI, and differentiating between atherosclerotic and cardioembolic ACI.
A few studies concerning hypercoagulable states have sufficiently been reported in patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI), as ACI is generally considered to be caused by platelet activation. Clot waveform analyses (CWA) for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and small amount of tissue factor FIX activation assay (sTF/FIXa) were examined in 108 patients with ACI, 61 patients without ACI, and 20 healthy volunteers. CWA-APTT and CWA-sTF/FIXa showed that the peak heights were significantly higher in ACI patients without anticoagulant therapy than in healthy volunteers. Absorbance exceeding 78.1 mm on the 1st DPH in the CWA-sTF/FIXa showed the highest odds ratio for ACI. The peak heights were significantly lower in the CWA-sTF/FIXa of ACI patients receiving argatroban therapy than in those of ACI patients without anticoagulant therapy. CWA can suggest a hypercoagulable state in ACI patients and may be useful for monitoring the need for anticoagulant therapy.
The present study aimed to identify useful biomarkers to predict deterioration in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 . A total of 201 COVID-19 patients were classified according to their disease severity into non-severe (n=125) and severe (n=76) groups, and the behavior of laboratory biomarkers was examined according to the prognosis. Neutrophil count, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), sialylated carbohydrate antigen KL-6 (KL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), presepsin (PSP) and D-dimer levels were significantly higher, and lymphocyte count and platelet count were significantly lower in the non-severe group compared with the severe group. In the non-severe group, ROC analysis demonstrated that only four biomarkers, CRP, PSP, AST and LDH were useful for differentiating the prognosis between improvement and deterioration subgroups. No strong correlation was revealed for any of the markers. Multivariate analysis identified CRP as a significant prognostic factor in non-severe cases (odds ratio, 41.45; 95% confidence interval, 4.91-349.24; P<0.001). However, there were no blood biomarkers that could predict the outcome of patients in the severe group. Overall, several blood markers changed significantly according to disease severity in the course of COVID-19 infection. Among them, CRP, PSP, LDH and AST were the most reliable markers for predicting the patient's prognosis in non-severe COVID-19 cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.