This study aimed to investigate the association between marital status and the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Data of patients with MBC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were classified into married and unmarried groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test was conducted to compare breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional models were used to determine whether marital status was independently associated with OS, and the Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard method was performed to determine whether marital status was independently associated with BCSS. In total, 16,513 patients with MBC were identified, including 8949 married (54.19%) and 7564 unmarried (45.81%) patients. The married patients were significantly younger [median age (interquartile range), 59.0 (50.0–68.0) vs. 63.0 (53.0–75.0); p < 0.001] and received more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and surgery (p < 0.001), than the unmarried patients. Moreover, married patients had higher 5-year BCSS (42.64% vs. 33.17%, p < 0.0001) and OS (32.22% vs. 21.44%, p < 0.0001) rates. Multivariable analysis revealed that marital status was an independent prognostic factor, and married status was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of breast cancer-specific (sub-hazard ratio, 0.845; 95% confidence interval, 0.804–0.888; p < 0.001) and all-cause (hazard ratio, 0.810; 95% confidence interval, 0.777–0.844; p < 0.001) mortality. Unmarried patients had a 15.5% increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality and a 19.0% increased risk of overall mortality compared with married patients with MBC. BCSS and OS were superior in married populations compared with unmarried populations in most subgroups. Marital status was an independent prognostic indicator for survival in patients with MBC and was associated with significant survival benefits.

BackgroundThe neuroprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valvular cardiac surgery remains unclear.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superior clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery or valve surgery. Before anesthesia induction, patients were randomly assigned to RIPC (three 5-min cycles of inflation and deflation of blood pressure cuff on the upper limb) or the control group. The primary endpoint was the changes in S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S100-β) levels at 6 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included changes in Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) levels.ResultsA total of 120 patients [mean age, 48.7 years; 36 women (34.3%)] were randomized at three cardiac surgery centers in China. One hundred and five patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis (52 in the RIPC group and 53 in the control group). The primary result demonstrated that at 6 h after surgery, S100-β levels were lower in the RIPC group than in the control group (50.75; 95% confidence interval, 67.08 to 64.40 pg/ml vs. 70.48; 95% CI, 56.84 to 84.10 pg/ml, P = 0.036). Compared to the control group, the concentrations of S100-β at 24 h and 72 h and the concentration of NSE at 6 h, 24 h, and 72 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the RIPC group. However, neither the MMSE nor the MoCA revealed significant between-group differences in postoperative cognitive performance at 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.ConclusionIn patients undergoing CPB-assisted cardiac surgery, RIPC attenuated brain damage as indicated with the decreased release of brain damage biomarker S100-β and NSE.Clinical trial registration[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT01231789].

No abstract