PURPOSE. To compare the visual field (VF) progression among high tension glaucoma (HTG), primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG), and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) subjects in routine clinical care. METHODS. All patients had ‡5 VF tests using HFA, 24-2, SITA-standard strategy. We compared the progression between glaucoma subtypes after matching the VFs for baseline severity (mean deviation [MD]) and the age at presentation. Global VF progression was evaluated by linear regression analysis (LRA) of MD. For local VF progression, scotoma expansion (SE) defined as appearance of new scotoma and scotoma deepening (SD) defined by pointwise LRA were calculated. SE and SD were analyzed in three VF zones: superior arcuate (SA), inferior arcuate (IA), and central (C). RESULTS. A total of 310 HTG, 304 PACG, and 165 NTG eyes were included. When VFs were matched by baseline MD, a greater number (n ¼ 20/76) of eyes with HTG showed significant progression compared to PACG (n ¼ 9/76; P ¼ 0.04). The number of progressing eyes were not significantly different between HTG and NTG (n ¼ 11/76; P ¼ 0.10) and between NTG and PACG (P ¼ 0.65). When the baseline VFs were matched by age, the number of eyes showing significant progression were similar in all the subtypes. SA zone in HTG and NTG showed greater SE and SD compared to other zones (P < 0.05), whereas IA zone in PACG showed greater SE and SD compared to other zones (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. In our cohort of treated primary glaucoma with matched baseline severity, a greater proportion of HTG eyes progressed faster compared to PACG. SA zone in HTG and NTG and IA zone in PACG showed greater VF progression.

To evaluate the visual photosensitivity threshold and objective photosensitivity luminance in healthy eyes, thereby providing a normative dataset that will lead to a better understanding of diseases causing photophobia. Methods:This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Emmetropes whose visual acuity was better than 0.18 logMAR (6/9) with no other ocular abnormality were included. Headache Impact Test-6 and visual light sensitivity questionnaires were administered. Visual photosensitivity threshold was measured subjectively using the ocular photosensitivity analyser. Objective photosensitivity luminance was assessed manually by evaluating videos recorded using an infrared camera and noting the intensity of light at the first squeezing reflex.Results: Seventy five normal subjects (age range, 7-71 years) were included.Median age was 32.7 years (inter-quartile range, 20.3-47.9 years). Forty (53.3%) were males. Median Headache Impact Test score was 38 (inter-quartile range, 36-42) and visual light sensitivity questionnaire score was 11 (inter-quartile range, 8-15). Mean (standard deviation) right eye, left eye and binocular visual photosensitivity threshold was 3.34 (0.78), 3.33 (0.81) and 3.37 (0.78) loglux, respectively.There was a significant negative correlation of visual light sensitivity questionnaire scores with right eye, left eye and binocular visual photosensitivity thresholds, and positive correlation of age with binocular visual photosensitivity thresholds. Mean (standard deviation) right eye, left eye and binocular objective photosensitivity luminance was 3.25 (0.55), 3.35 (0.47) and 3.15 (0.52) loglux, respectively. Age was only positively correlated with binocular objective photosensitivity luminance, and there was no correlation between age and right eye or left eye objective photosensitivity luminance. Conclusions:The study characterised, for the first time, objective photosensitivity luminance and established normative data for both visual photosensitivity

No abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate glaucoma and its management in eyes with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston-Kpro) and Aurolab keratoprosthesis (Auro-Kpro) in an Indian cohort.Methods: This retrospective comparative case series included 175 eyes of 175 patients who underwent type 1 keratoprosthesis from 2009 until 2017; type 1 Boston-Kpro was performed in 107 eyes (107 patients) and Auro-Kpro in 68 eyes (68 patients). The eyes with ,1-month follow-up were excluded, and hence, for the analysis of glaucoma, 62 eyes with Auro-Kpro and 99 eyes with Boston-Kpro were included. Progression was defined as the worsening of optic disc damage/progression by visual field/uncontrolled IOP needing additional medications or glaucoma surgery. Results:The post-Kpro mean follow-up was 1.8 6 1.7 years. After Kpro, overall glaucoma was noted in 61% of eyes (98/161). Preexisting glaucoma was noted in 28% of eyes (45/161), postoperative glaucoma was noted in 33% of eyes (53/161), and 39% of eyes (63/161) did not have glaucoma. Among those with preexisting glaucoma, 49% of eyes (22/45) progressed after Kpro implantation. The proportion of eyes with glaucoma in Auro-Kpro (56.5% of eyes) and Boston-Kpro (63.6% of eyes) was similar (P = 0.46). The Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative survival (Kpro-retention rate) was similar in eyes with and without glaucoma (83% vs. 76% at 1 year, 72% vs. 70% at 2 years; P = 0.65). A higher number of prior intraocular surgeries (P = 0.04) was significantly associated with risk for postoperative glaucoma.Conclusions: Glaucoma was seen in more than half of the eyes with type 1 keratoprosthesis. The presence of glaucoma did not seem to affect the retention of keratoprosthesis. A high rate of postoperative glaucoma and the progression of preexisting glaucoma need close monitoring and appropriate management.

No abstract