No abstract

Introduction: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an integral part in the management of carcinoma penis. The concerns about the postoperative morbidity associated with open ILND led to modification in the template of dissection and adoption of minimally invasive techniques such as video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic-assisted VEIL (R-VEIL). In this review, we aim to describe the techniques, case selection, perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes of VEIL and R-VEIL and to compare it with open ILND. Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the articles for VEIL and R-VEIL. Using PRISMA guidelines, literature search yielded 3783 articles, of which 32 full-text articles relevant to the topic were selected and reviewed, after consensus from authors. Results: After the first description of VEIL, various modifications in port placements and approaches were described. Several studies have shown, VEIL and R VEIL are safe and feasible in both node-negative and node-positive Ca penis patients. Compared to open ILND, VEIL had fewer wound infections and skin necrosis, minimal blood loss, shorter mean hospital stays, and reduced duration of drain kept. There is no difference in mean lymph node yield and recurrence rates between open ILND, VEIL, R-VEIL. Conclusion: VEIL and R-VEIL are safe and have comparable oncological outcomes with open ILND.

Introduction: Minimal invasive surgeries (MIS) for large size adrenal tumors are still debatable. The objective is to evaluate the contemporary peri- and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing (open = OA, laparoscopic = LA, and robotic = RA) adrenalectomies in three institutions. Materials and methods: Retrospectively gathered peri- and post-operative data of 235 patients, underwent adrenalectomy at three Institutions over a 7-year period (2013–2020) were analyzed. All patients underwent thorough radiological and endocrine workup. Results: Two hundred and thirty five patients who underwent adrenalectomy (OA ( n = 29), LA ( n = 146), and RA ( n = 60)) were assessed. OA ( n = 29) versus Minimally invasive surgery ( n = 206) showed significant differences (median, p value) in larger tumour size, cm (9.4 vs 5, ( p = 0.0001)), longer operative time, mins (240 vs 100, ( p = 0.0001)), longer hospital stay, days (8 vs 3,( p = .0001)), Higher readmission rates (14% vs 1.9%), higher blood loss, ml (400 vs 100, ( p = 0.0001)) requiring blood transfusion (14% vs 4.3%) ( p = 0.03), higher intraoperative complication (21% vs 6%) ( p = 0.0004), and post op complications (17% vs 5.3%) ( p = 0.01). Amongst the MIS (RA vs LA), RA appeared be have better outcomes in terms of shorter operative time, less blood loss and less intra operative complications with a p value <0.05. These results were consistent for the assessment of patients who had ⩾6 cm tumor size. The postoperative complication rates were lowest with RA (3.3%) compared to OA (17%) and LA (6.1%). Conclusions: Contemporary practice of adrenalectomy shows that robotic adrenalectomy is safe and effective irrespective of the tumor size.

No abstract