Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the commonest childhood malignancy with high cure rates due to recent advances in central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis. The disease per se, as well as the prophylactic therapy, predisposes the child to complications such as cerebrovascular events, infections, drug toxicities, etc. The purpose of this study is to highlight the pathophysiology and the imaging features (with appropriate examples) of these complications and to propose a diagnostic algorithm based on MRI. Interpreting these scans in the light of clinical inputs very often helps the radiologist reach an appropriate diagnosis and help treatment and management.
Background: Multimodality treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with surgery and adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM), along with an emerging role for neoadjuvant IM prior to evaluation for resectability has resulted in high survival rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery for GIST, prior to or followed by IM therapy. A total of 112 patients underwent surgery between January 2009 and March 2015 at our centre. This included 27 patients with upfront resectable disease, 76 patients with locally advanced GIST who received neoadjuvant IM followed by surgery and 9 patients with metastatic disease who had excellent response to IM and were taken for surgery. Results: The primary tumor in the non metastatic patients was in the stomach (53%), duodenum (16%), rectum (12%), jejunum (11%), ileum (7%), and others (2%). Median duration of neoadjuvant IM was 5 months with 4 patients showing disease progression during neoadjuvant IM. Ninety-three percent of all patients had R0 resections, while 7% had R+ resections. The estimated 3-and 5-year DFS in non-metastatic patients was 86.1% and 67% respectively with a 3-and 5-year median OS of 95.4% and 91.7% respectively.Five-year PFS and OS for the metastatic patients was 88.8% and 100% respectively. Lack of adjuvant IM was the only factor related to inferior PFS and OS. Conclusions: Longer duration of neoadjuvant IM should be considered in locally advanced GIST prior to surgery and resection may be considered in responding metastatic patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016;7(4):624-631 jgo.amegroups.com spillage of tumor cells (8-10). There is growing evidence for neoadjuvant IM therapy in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with major evidence of benefit shown in the EORTC-STBSG retrospective analysis (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic profile, presentation and outcomes of 112 patients with GIST who underwent surgery at our institution and were potential candidates for either neoadjuvant or adjuvant IM over a period of 6 years. We also attempted to identify potential prognostic factors with respect to outcomes and placed special emphasis on patients receiving neoadjuvant IM. MethodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of all GIST patients who underwent surgery and presented between January 2009 to March 2015 at Department of GI & Hepatopancreaticobiliary Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, was performed. Clinical and radiological data were recorded from patient files and electronic medical records. Patients presenting in the above study period were subdivided on the basis of clinical presentation and treatment received into localized operable, locally advanced, operated elsewhere on adjuvant treatment and incidental GISTs. Locally advanced GISTs were defined by the size, need for multivisceral resections, anatomic proximity with major vessels and risk of intraoperative tumor spillage. Patients opera...
BackgroundClassical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has excellent survival rates, but late effects are an issue and dictate modern approaches. We analyzed the clinical profile and outcome of cHL treated on a risk‐adapted approach aimed at reducing late effects while improving historical outcomes at our center.ProcedureChildren (≤15 years) consecutively treated for cHL from January 2013 through December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. 18FDG‐PET‐CT–based staging and response assessment was done after two cycles for early response (ERA) and end of chemotherapy (late‐response assessment [LRA]) if not in complete response (CR; Deauville < 4) at ERA. Stages IA/IB/IIA were low risk (LR) and received two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine). Stages IAX/IBX/IIAX/IIB/IIIA were intermediate risk (IR), and stages IIBE/IIBX/IIIAE/IIIAX/IIIB/IVA/IVB were high risk (HR). Both received two cycles of OEPA (oncocristine/etoposide/prednisolone/adriamycin). Those in ERA‐CR received two cycles of ABVD if LR, and two and four cycles of COPDac (cyclophosphamide/oncocristine/prednisolone/dacarbazine), respectively, for IR and HR. Involved‐field radiotherapy (IFRT) was given to bulky sites and ERA < CR. Those at LRA < CR (Deauville < 3) or progression at any stage received salvage regimens.ResultsIn the study period, 126 patients were identified who received the above protocol. There were 12 LR, and 114 advanced staged Hodgkin lymphoma (AHL) (18, IR; 96, HR) of which 91 (79.8%) had bulky sites. Eight (66.6%) LR and 93 (83%) AHL patients achieved ERA‐CRs. IFRT was given to 4 (33.3%) LR patients with ERA < CR, and 92 (80.7%) of AHL (91 bulky sites; 1 ERA < CR). At a median follow‐up of 31 months (range, 17–62), three‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were both 100% for LR, and 94.4% (95% CI, 66.0%–99.2%) for IR, whereas for HR it was 90.3% (95% CI, 82.2%–94.8%) and 92.6% (95% CI, 85.2%–96.4%), respectively.ConclusionsChildren with HL have favorable outcomes with manageable toxicities when treated on a risk‐stratified and adapted approach. A high proportion of AHL have bulky disease necessitating IFRT, a concern that will have to be factored in future strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.