The enzyme α1,3-galactosyltransferase (α1,3GT or GCTA1) synthesizes α1,3-galactose (α1,3Gal) epitopes (Galα1,3Galβ1,4GlcNAc-R), which are the major xenoantigens causing hyperacute rejection in pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Complete removal of α1,3Gal from pig organs is the critical step toward the success of xenotransplantation. We reported earlier the targeted disruption of one allele of the α1,3GT gene in cloned pigs. A selection procedure based on a bacterial toxin was used to select for cells in which the second allele of the gene was knocked out. Sequencing analysis demonstrated that knockout of the second allele of the α1,3GT gene was caused by a T-to-G single point mutation at the second base of exon 9, which resulted in inactivation of the α1,3GT protein. Four healthy α1,3GT double-knockout female piglets were produced by three consecutive rounds of cloning. The piglets carrying a point mutation in the α1,3GT gene hold significant value, as they would allow production of α1,3Gal-deficient pigs free of antibiotic-resistance genes and thus have the potential to make a safer product for human use.The enzyme α1,3-galactosyltransferase (α1,3GT or GGTA1) synthesizes α1,3Gal epitopes (Galα1,3Galβ1,4GlcNAc-R) on the cell surface of almost all mammals with the exception of humans, apes, and Old World monkeys (1). α1,3Gal epitopes are the major xenoantigens causing hyperacute rejection (HAR) in pig-to-human xenotransplantation (2-4). Many reports have also indicated that α1,3Gal epitopes are involved in acute vascular rejection (AVR) of xenografts (4-6). Piglets with α1,3GT heterozygous knockout have been cloned Copyright © 2003 by our group (7) and another team (8) in the last year. To produce homozygous α1,3GT knockout piglets by natural breeding, assuming both male and female heterozygous knockout pigs are available at the same time and are fertile, is feasible but takes up to 12 months. However, by using a second-round knockout and cloning strategy, we could save up to 6 months and all cloned piglets would be α1,3GT double knockout (DKO). We have selected and enriched for α1,3GT DKO cells by using a bacterial toxin, toxin A from Clostridium difficile, which binds with high affinity to α1,3Gal epitopes and produces a cytotoxic effect on cells that are α1,3Gal-positive (9). Toxin A uses α1,3Gal epitopes as a cell surface receptor and causes "rounding" and lifting of the α1,3Gal-positive cells from the surface of the growth vessel (10, 11).Heterozygous α1,3GT knockout fetal fibroblasts, 657A-I11 1-6 cells, were isolated from a day-32 pregnancy as described in (7). To avoid using a second antibiotic-resistance gene as a selection marker, we constructed an ATG (start codon)-targeting α1,3GT knockout vector, pPL680 (12), which also contains a neo gene, to knock out the second allele of the α1,3GT gene. 657A-I11 1-6 cells were transfected by electroporation with pPL680 and selected for the α1,3Gal-negative phenotype with purified C. difficile toxin A (13). One colony (680B1) was isolated and expanded af...
Since the first report of live mammals produced by nuclear transfer from a cultured differentiated cell population in 1995 (ref. 1), successful development has been obtained in sheep, cattle, mice and goats using a variety of somatic cell types as nuclear donors. The methodology used for embryo reconstruction in each of these species is essentially similar: diploid donor nuclei have been transplanted into enucleated MII oocytes that are activated on, or after transfer. In sheep and goat pre-activated oocytes have also proved successful as cytoplast recipients. The reconstructed embryos are then cultured and selected embryos transferred to surrogate recipients for development to term. In pigs, nuclear transfer has been significantly less successful; a single piglet was reported after transfer of a blastomere nucleus from a four-cell embryo to an enucleated oocyte; however, no live offspring were obtained in studies using somatic cells such as diploid or mitotic fetal fibroblasts as nuclear donors. The development of embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer is dependent upon a range of factors. Here we investigate some of these factors and report the successful production of cloned piglets from a cultured adult somatic cell population using a new nuclear transfer procedure.
Galactose-alpha1,3-galactose (alpha1,3Gal) is the major xenoantigen causing hyperacute rejection in pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Disruption of the gene encoding pig alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase (alpha1,3GT) by homologous recombination is a means to completely remove the alpha1,3Gal epitopes from xenografts. Here we report the disruption of one allele of the pig alpha1,3GT gene in both male and female porcine primary fetal fibroblasts. Targeting was confirmed in 17 colonies by Southern blot analysis, and 7 of them were used for nuclear transfer. Using cells from one colony, we produced six cloned female piglets, of which five were of normal weight and apparently healthy. Southern blot analysis confirmed that these five piglets contain one disrupted pig alpha1,3GT allele.
Pre-implantation embryos produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) have varied developmental potentials. The majority of SCNT blastocysts do not develop to term, and the mechanisms inhibiting development are still largely unknown. Aggregation of cloned embryos has been attempted to compensate for the developmental deficiency of individual cloned embryos. In this report, we investigated the impact of aggregation of bovine cloned embryos at the four-cell stage on in vitro development and gene expression of the embryos. Cell numbers and development rate of aggregated (NTagg) and non-aggregated (NT) blastocysts were characterized and compared. The blastocyst formation after aggregation was modeled using the binominal distribution. The results indicate that aggregation enhances the blastocyst formation but does not increase the overall blastocyst rate. Additionally, utilizing microarray gene chip analysis 8.8% of 8,059 genes analyzed were differentially expressed between NTagg and NT blastocysts, with more than 80% of the differentially expressed genes up-regulated in the NTagg blastocysts. Up-regulated genes include those involved in transcription, biosynthesis and signaling such as TDGF1, HNFA, CAV1, GLU5, and CD81. Our results indicate that aggregation of bovine cloned embryos at an early stage promotes the in vitro development of the resulting pre-implantation embryos.
The genetic manipulation of donor cells before nuclear transfer (NT) enables prior selection for transgene integration. However, selection for genetically modified cells using antibiotic drugs often results in mixed populations, resulting in a mixture of transgenic and nontransgenic donor cells for NT. In this study, we attempted to develop efficient strategies for the generation of human bile salt-stimulated lipase (BSSL) transgenic cows. Preimplantation screening by either biopsy or green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was used to detect NT-derived BSSL transgenic embryos to ensure that the calf born would be transgenic. We compared the development rates of NT-derived embryos from G418- and GFP-selected donor cells. There were no significant differences (P < 0.001) in cleavage rate (67.2% vs. 60.0%) and blastocyst formation rate (44.9% vs. 41.2%). We also compared the pregnancy rates of the G418/biopsy and GFP preimplantation screened NT-derived blastocysts. The Day 40 pregnancy rate of the G418/biopsy group (40%) was lower than that of the GFP group (57%), but the calf birth rate of the G418/biopsy group (40%) was higher than that of the GFP group (21%). Healthy BSSL transgenic calves were born after both screening processes. This is the first report of biopsy-screened cloned transgenic animals. The results suggest that both selection methods are useful for detecting transgenic NT embryos without negatively affecting their development into viable transgenic offspring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.