Introduction: LncRNA growth arrest-specific transcript 5 (GAS5) has been proven to be involved in autoimmune diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis is a type of autoimmune disease that may affect myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. However, its direct role in MG is unknown.Methods: Our study included 62 generalized MG patients. GAS5 expression was analyzed with real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). The interaction between GAS5 and interleukin 10 (IL-10) was explored in overexpressed cells using real time quantitative polymerase chain reactions (RT-qPCRs) and western blot. The correlation of GAS5 and IL-10 was analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis. The diagnostic value of GAS5 for MG was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: GAS5 and IL-10 mRNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were significantly lower in MG patients than healthy controls. Downregulated GAS5 effectively distinguished MG patients from healthy controls. GAS5 expression was positively correlated with IL-10 expression in both MG patients and healthy controls.GAS5 overexpression significantly upregulated IL-10 expression in PBMCs derived from both MG patients and healthy controls.
Conclusion:LncRNA GAS5 may improve generalized MG by positively regulating IL-10 expression.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of using the lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR), hemoglobin–platelet ratio (HPR), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels alone or in combination for diagnosing colon cancer. Methods We assessed 124 consecutive patients who were pathologically diagnosed with colon cancer and 131 patients who were diagnosed with benign colon tumors in this retrospective study. We then analyzed correlations between LMR, HPR, and clinicopathological findings. The diagnostic values of LMR, HPR, and CEA alone or in combination in colon cancer patients were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves. Results The median LMR, HPR, and CEA values in colon cancer patients showed significant correlation with the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage. Moreover, there was a significant difference in HPR between patients with tumor size ≥5 cm and those with tumor size <5 cm. Compared with LMR, HPR, or CEA alone, combinations of CEA with LMR, CEA with HPR, and HPR with LMR all had higher area under the curve values, among which the combination of all three (LMR, HPR, and CEA) had the highest area under the curve. Conclusion The combination of LMR, HPR, and CEA may be a valuable indicator for monitoring colon cancer.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the association between remote diffusion-weighted imaging lesions (R-DWILs) and blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of 375 patients with primary ICH within 24 h onset. R-DWILs were defined as hyperintensity lesions in DWI remote from the hematoma. Blood pressure recordings were extracted up to 24 h post-admission. BPV was measured using SD, coefficient of variation (CV), and successive variation (SV).ResultsRemote DWI lesions were detected in 65 (17.3%) primary ICH patients. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, parameters of BPV were independently associated with R-DWILs, and the results remained consistent after being adjusted with mean SBP. SD, CV, and SV values in the highest quintile, showed 3- to 8-fold increased risk of R-DWILs, compared with the lowest quintile. ΔSBP demonstrated a significant difference in 2 different predictive models. Max SBP only dictated a significant difference in model 1. Mean SBP, admission SBP, and min SBP, failed to present an association with R-DWILs in model 1 or model 2.ConclusionOur results provided additional evidence that BPV is associated with the development of R-DWILs in primary ICH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.