We aimed to compare impulse oscillation system (IOS) and traditional pulmonary function tests (PFTs) for the assessment of the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to assess the use of IOS parameters to identify patients who were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)%pred < 50%.Patients with COPD (n = 215) were enrolled at the Ninth Hospital of Xi’an Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between October 2014 and September 2016. All patients were assessed by traditional PFT and IOS. Diagnostic performance of IOS parameters to determine indication for patients of FEV1%pred < 50% was assessed on receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.Out of 215 patients, 18, 83, 78, and 36 patients were classified as grade 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity grading. On Spearman correlation analysis, FEV1%pred, MMEF 75%–25%, and residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC) correlated with total respiratory impedance (Z5)%pred, resistance at 5 Hz (R5)-resistance at 20 Hz (R20), R5-R20% R5, R5, R5%pred, frequency response (Fres), reactance area (Ax), and reactance at 5 Hz (X5). On ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of X5 absolute value, Fres, Ax, Z5%pred, R5-R20, and R5-R20% R5 were 0.748, 0.755, 0.760, 0.705, 0.715, and 0.735, respectively, for COPD patients who required inhalational glucocorticoid therapy.IOS parameters showed a good correlation with traditional pulmonary function parameters; reactance parameters showed a stronger correlation than that of the resistance parameters. IOS can be used as an alternative method for pulmonary function assessment in patients with COPD with FEV1%pred < 50% who need inhalational glucocorticoid therapy.Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR-OCH-14004904.

Objective To investigate the association between different smoking statuses and survival and emphysema in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods This retrospective study included patients admitted from October 2014 to September 2017. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, impulse oscillometry, and traditional pulmonary function data were collected. The relationship between smoking and EI was analyzed via binary logistic regression after adjusting for other factors. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log rank test. Results The patients with AECOPD (357 cases) were identified (and stratified into three groups: never smoked (NS; n=83), former smokers (FS, n=118), and current smokers (CS; n=156). Compared with CS, NS were older and predominantly female. No differences were observed in respiratory symptoms and acute exacerbation between CS and NS. NS had higher resistance and reaction in the central and peripheral airways, while CS exhibited more severe diffuse dysfunction. CS demonstrated more severe and extensive emphysema. Smoking was an independent risk factor for emphysema after adjusting for age, forced expiratory volume in the first second over predicted value, BMI, leukocyte count, and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient. No difference in 5-year survival rates between NS and CS was established. Conclusion CS has the worst pulmonary function, suggesting a more important destruction of the lung parenchyma, while AECOPD without smoking risk factors mostly affects the airways. Impulse oscillometry can be used for imaging airway-dominant AECOPD. There was no difference in the 5-year survival rate.

In terms of airway wall area and emphysema index, patients with chronic bronchitis with PRISm were essentially no different than those with chronic bronchitis without abnormal spirometry, whereas for symptoms, they are more like GOLD 1 and 2 patients. Our findings show that it is not yet clear whether it constitutes an intermediate stage of chronic bronchitis with normal lung function that progression to early COPD.

Objective: To investigate the associations between intrapulmonary vascular volume (IPVV) depicted on inspiratory and expiratory CT scans and disease severity in COPD patients, and to determine which CT parameters can be used to predict IPVV.Methods: We retrospectively collected 89 CT examinations acquired on COPD patients from an available database. All subjects underwent both inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. We quantified the IPVV, airway wall thickness (WT), the percentage of the airway wall area (WA%), and the extent of emphysema (LAA%−950) using an available pulmonary image analysis tool. The underlying relationship between IPVV and COPD severity, which was defined as mild COPD (GOLD stage I and II) and severe COPD (GOLD stage III and IV), was analyzed using the Student's t-test (or Mann-Whitney U-test). The correlations of IPVV with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), LAA%−950, and airway parameters for the third to sixth generation bronchus were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and multiple stepwise regression.Results: In the subgroup with only inspiratory examinations, the correlation coefficients between IPVV and PFT measures were −0.215 ~ −0.292 (p &lt; 0.05), the correlation coefficients between IPVV and WT3−6 were 0.233 ~ 0.557 (p &lt; 0.05), and the correlation coefficient between IPVV and LAA%−950 were 0.238 ~ 0.409 (p &lt; 0.05). In the subgroup with only expiratory scan, the correlation coefficients between IPVV and PFT measures were −0.238 ~ −0.360 (p &lt; 0.05), the correlation coefficients between IPVV and WT3−6 were 0.260 ~ 0.566 (p &lt; 0.05), and the correlation coefficient between IPVV and LAA%−950 were 0.241 ~ 0.362 (p &lt; 0.05). The multiple stepwise regression analyses demonstrated that WT were independently associated with IPVV (P &lt; 0.05).Conclusion: The expiratory CT scans can provide a more accurate assessment of COPD than the inspiratory CT scans, and the airway wall thickness maybe an independent predictor of pulmonary vascular alteration in patients with COPD.

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the emphysema index (EI) in distinguishing chronic bronchitis (CB) from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its role, combined with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, in the evaluation of COPD. Methods. A total of 92 patients with CB and 277 patients with COPD were enrolled in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to evaluate whether the EI can preliminarily distinguish chronic bronchitis from COPD. Considering the heterogeneity of COPD, there might be missed diagnosis of some patients with bronchitis type when differentiating COPD patients only by EI. Therefore, patients with COPD were classified according to the CAT score and EI into four groups: Group 1 (EI < 16%, CAT < 10), Group 2 (EI < 16%, CAT ≥ 10), Group 3 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT < 10), and Group 4 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT ≥ 10). The records of pulmonary function and quantitative computed tomography findings were retrospectively analyzed. Results. ROC curve analysis showed that EI = 16.2% was the cutoff value for distinguishing COPD from CB. Groups 1 and 2 exhibited significantly higher maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) percent predicted (pred), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal midexpiratory flow of 25–75% pred, carbon monoxide-diffusing capacity (DLCO)/alveolar ventilation (VA), FEV1 % pred p ≤ 0.013 , and maximal expiratory flow 50% pred (all p < 0.05 ) than Group 4. FEV1/FVC and DLCO/VA were significantly lower in Group 3 than in Group 2 ( p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 , respectively). The residual volume/total lung capacity was higher in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2 p < 0.05 . Conclusions. The combination of EI and CAT was effective in the evaluation of COPD.