PurposeTextbook outcome (TO) is a novel composite measure of clinical outcomes that can be used to measure the quality of surgical outcomes. The aim of this cohort study was to propose TO criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and to identify reasons for TO failure and individual patient factors that predispose to failure.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data for 189 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TO was defined as laparoscopic cholecystectomy without conversion to open cholecystectomy, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo classification ≥2), prolonged length of stay (≥10 days), readmission within 30 days, or mortality.ResultsTO was achieved in 154 of 189 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Medical costs were lower in the TO‐achieved group than in the TO‐failure group. Factors associated with TO failure on multivariate analysis were age > 70 years, hemoglobin <11.9 g/dL, and white blood cells >18 000 / μL (all P < .05).ConclusionsApplying TO to patients with acute cholecystitis allowed us to evaluate the overall quality of care related to hospitalization. TO may provide better assessment of the quality of care and help determine the treatment choice and reduce costs.
Introduction:The management of patients with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt located in the peritoneal cavity undergoing laparoscopic surgery is an issue that has not yet been settled. These patients are at risk of increased intracranial pressure caused by peritoneal insufflation, shunt dysfunction, and shunt infection/retrograde meningitis. This study aimed to determine the need for perioperative shunt intervention in CSF shunt patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed five shunt patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution between 2012 and 2022, as well as 17 patients described in previous reports.Results: Among the 22 patients, shunt type was ventriculoperitoneal in 14 and lumboperitoneal in eight. The most common indication for CSF shunt was hydrocephalus caused by cerebral vascular accident (50.0%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed for cholecystolithiasis in 13 patients (59.1%), acute cholecystitis in eight (36.4%), and gallbladder polyp in one (4.5%). Shunt clamping or externalization was performed in six patients. Two patients in the group that did not undergo shunt clamping or externalization experienced complications (intra abdominal abscess and subcutaneous emphysema). However, the incidence of short-term complications (both overall and shunt-related) and median length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion:Routine shunt clamping, externalization, or removal might not be necessarily required in patients with a ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal shunt undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
AimPostoperative dysphagia after emergency abdominal surgery (EAS) in patients of advanced age has become problematic, and appropriate dysphagia management is needed. This study was performed to identify predictive factors of dysphagia after EAS and to explore the usefulness of swallowing screening tools (SSTs).MethodsThis retrospective study included 267 patients of advanced age who underwent EAS from 2012 to 2022. They were assigned to a dysphagia group and non‐dysphagia group using the Food Intake Level Scale (FILS) (dysphagia was defined as a FILS level of <7 on postoperative day 10). From 2018, original SSTs including a modified water swallowing test were performed by nurses.ResultsThe incidence of postoperative dysphagia was 22.8% (61/267). Patients were significantly older in the dysphagia than non‐dysphagia group. The proportions of patients who had poor nutrition, cerebrovascular disorder, Parkinson's disease, dementia, nursing‐care service, high intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), and postoperative ventilator management were much higher in the dysphagia than non‐dysphagia group. Using logistic regression analysis, high IMAC, postoperative ventilator management, cerebrovascular disorder, and dementia were correlated with postoperative dysphagia and were assigned 10, 4, 3, and 3 points, respectively, according to each odds ratio. The optimal cut‐off value was 7 according to a receiver operating characteristics curve. Using 1:1 propensity score matching for high‐risk patients, the incidence of postoperative dysphagia was reduced by SSTs.ConclusionsThe new prediction score obtained from this study can identify older patients at high risk for dysphagia after EAS, and SSTs may improve these patients' short‐term outcomes.
Background Patients on long-term dialysis are prone to hemorrhagic complications, particularly uremic bleeding, but gallbladder hemorrhage is rare, even in patients on dialysis. There have been occasional reports of a Dieulafoy lesion being a cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, but its occurrence within the gallbladder is quite rare. This report describes a case of gallbladder hemorrhage from a Dieulafoy lesion in a patient on hemodialysis that was diagnosed early and successfully treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Case presentation The patient was a 68-year-old woman on long-term hemodialysis with end-stage renal failure who presented with epigastralgia and back pain. There was no history of trauma or oral administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents. There were no signs of an inflammatory reaction or hyperbilirubinemia. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a slightly hyperdense area in the distended gallbladder and extravasation within the gallbladder lumen but no gallstones. A severe atherosclerotic lesion was also found. She was diagnosed to have gallbladder hemorrhage and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Although the postoperative course was complicated by drug fever, she was discharged on postoperative day 10 in a satisfactory condition. Histology revealed hemorrhagic ulceration with an exposed blood vessel accompanied by abnormal arteries in the submucosa. Arteriosclerosis with eccentric intimal hyperplasia in a small-sized artery was also seen. The diagnosis was gallbladder hemorrhage from a Dieulafoy lesion. Conclusions A Dieulafoy lesion should be kept in mind as a cause of gallbladder hemorrhage in a patient with severe arteriosclerosis and a bleeding diathesis, particularly if on dialysis, and treated as early as possible.
Background Textbook Outcome (TO) is a novel composite measure of clinical outcomes that can be used to measure the quality of surgical outcomes. The aim of this cohort study was to propose TO criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and to identify reasons for TO failure and individual patient factors that predispose to failure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data for 189 consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TO was defined as laparoscopic cholecystectomy without conversion to open cholecystectomy, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo classification ≥ 2), prolonged length of stay (≥ 10 days), readmission within 30 days, or mortality. Demographic and clinical differences between patients with and without TO were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results TO was achieved in 81% (n = 154) of 189 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Medical costs were lower in the TO-achieved group than in the TO-failure group. Factors associated with TO on univariate analysis were age, vascular disease, history of malignant tumor treatment, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, gallbladder perforation, and > 3 days since the onset of symptoms. Factors on multivariate analysis were age > 70 years, hemoglobin < 11.9 g/dl, and white blood cells > 18,000 / µl (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Applying TO to patients with acute cholecystitis allowed us to evaluate the overall quality of care related to hospitalization. TO may provide better assessment of the quality of care and help determine the treatment choice and reduce costs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.