Objective: Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is now recommended as a first-line staging modality in prostate cancer patients, and the widespread use of DWIBS may lead to an increased frequency of incidental findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with DWIBS. Methods: Data from 124 patients with prostate cancer (age, 76.5 ± 5.6 years), who underwent 1.5 T WB-MRI with STIR, TSE-T2, TSE-T1, In/Out GRE, and DWIBS sequences, were retrospectively analyzed. Findings unrelated to prostate cancer were considered as incidental findings and categorized into two groups based on their clinical implications, as follow: imaging follow-up or additional examinations was required (significant incidental findings) and no need to additional work-up (non-significant incidental findings). A Chi-square test was performed to compare the differences in the prevalence of significant incidental findings based on age (≤75 and>75 years old). Results: A total of 334 incidental findings were found, with 8.1% (n = 27) as significant incidental findings. Significant incidental findings were more frequent in patients over 75 years old than those of 75 years old or younger (28.6% vs 11.1%, p = 0.018). Conclusion: Clinically significant incidental findings, which required imaging follow-up or additional examinations, were commonly observed in prostate cancer patients on WB-MRI/DWIBS. Advances in knowledge: Some incidental findings were clinically significant which may lead to changes in treatment strategy. Checking the entire organ carefully for abnormalities, and reporting any incidental findings detected are important.
We propose a practical method for setting the optimal inversion times (TI) for double inversion recovery (DIR) sequences. Our method used the measurement of signal intensity (SI) from real images to set the optimal TI for white-matter (WM) and gray-matter (GM)-attenuated inversion recovery (WAIR and GAIR, respectively) images. 3D-DIR images of healthy volunteers were obtained on 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners and the SIs of GM, WM, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were evaluated on real images. We found TIs at which the SI of WM or GM was null. Then, we found TI (=TI + TI) at which the SI of CSF was null. We defined the two TIs as optimal TIs. We assessed the utility of these TIs with additional volunteers and patients, and similar images were obtained with the determined TIs. Optimal TIs for DIR images could be efficiently determined using this method.
SummaryIt is important to optimize imaging parameters in 3D-double inversion recovery (DIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting cortical micro lesions. However, inadequate parameters markedly raise blurring in 3D-DIR MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the blurring and refocus flip angle (RFA) in 3D-DIR MRI. White matter attenuated inversion recovery (WAIR) images as a test sample were obtained by 1.5T MRI with various RFA settings (30°, 40°, 60°, 100°, 140°, 180°, and variable refocus flip angle (VRFA)). Optimal RFA was evaluated using Schefféʼs method (Nakaya changing method) by five observers. The results of average preferences indicated that RFA settings of under the 60°of RFA or VRFA suppressed the blurring in 3D-DIR MRI. The yard sticks of RFAs of 30°and 40°were significantly higher than the yard sticks of other RFAs (p< 0.01). For detecting cortical microlesions, it is very important to obtain WAIR images with no blurring. Using low RFA or VRFA didnʼt cause significant differences of signal intensity between high-frequency region and lowfrequency region in k-space of 3D-DIR MRI. Therefore, it is recommended to set lower RFA (under 60°or VRFA) for suppressing blur in 3D-DIR MRI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.