Background: We investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects in nonglaucomatous subjects.Methods: We examined 20,385 adults who visited the Health Promotion Center of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between May 2015 and April 2016. After excluding those with known glaucoma or glaucomatous optic discs, subjects with and without localized RNFL defects were 1:5 propensity score matched. Metabolic syndrome components, including central obesity, elevated triglyceride, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated blood pressure (BP), and elevated fasting glucose, were compared between two groups. We performed logistic regression to investigate the association between RNFL defects and each component of metabolic syndrome and the number of metabolic syndrome components.Results: Subjects with RNFL defects showed higher waist-to-hip ratios, systolic (SBP) and diastolic BPs (DBP), fasting blood glucose, and HbA1c levels than did those without RNFL defects both before and after propensity score matching. The number of metabolic syndrome components was significantly greater in those with RNFL defects (1.66±1.35) than in those without (1.27±1.32, P<0.01). In multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) of RNFL defects was significantly increased in subjects with central obesity [OR =1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.13], elevated BP (OR =1.50, 95% CI: 1.09-2.05), and an elevated fasting glucose level (OR =1.42,). An increased number of metabolic syndrome components was associated with a higher risk of RNFL defects.Conclusions: Localized RNFL defects in nonglaucomatous subjects are associated with metabolic syndrome components, including central obesity, elevated BP, and an elevated fasting glucose level, suggesting that comorbid metabolic syndrome should be considered when evaluating subjects with RNFL defects.
Purpose: To compare the refractive measurements from a wavefront aberrometer, autorefractor, and retinoscopy after cycloplegia in evaluating the usefulness and validity of refractive measurements by a wavefront aberrometer in children. Methods: A total of 130 eyes of 65 children, aged from 3 to 16 years, were examined using retinoscopy, a wavefront aberrometer (OPD-Scan III), and an autorefractor (KR-1) after cycloplegia. Refractive measurements were converted to power vectors (M, J0, and J45) and cylindrical absolute values for statistical analysis. The agreement between instruments was assessed and the correlations of measurements were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was performed on two subgroups: one representing less refractive error (|M| < 2 D on cycloplegic retinoscopy) and the other with larger refractive error (|M| ≥ 2 D on cycloplegic retinoscopy). Results: Compared with retinoscopy readings, the aberrometer and autorefractor yielded more myopic values (p = 0.007, p < 0.001). In the less refractive error group, the autorefractor results showed statistically significant differences from retinoscopy readings for M, J0, and J45 and the cylindrical absolute value (all p < 0.05); there were no statistically significant differences between M, J0, and J45 vectors of the aberrometer and those obtained using retinoscopy (p = 0.674, p = 0.699, p = 0.766). With the larger refractive error group, the M vectors of the aberrometer and autorefractor showed more myopic values than the M vector retinoscopy readings; the differences were statistically significant (all p < 0.001).
Conclusions:The wavefront aberrometer yielded refraction readings closer to those obtained with retinoscopy than the automated refraction in the less refractive error group. With a larger refractive error, statistically significant differences (all p < 0.001) were found among the aberrometer, autorefractor, and retinoscopy readings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.