Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection may elevate the risk of hyperglycemia and other complications in patients with and without prior diabetes history. It is not clear whether the virus induces type 1 or type 2 diabetes or instead causes a novel form of diabetes. Precise mechanism of diabetes onset in COVID-19 patients remains unresolved. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to know the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of new-onset diabetes among post-COVID-19 patients and association of disease severity and occurrence of new-onset diabetes in post-COVID-19 Patients. Materials and Methods: Patients age more than 18 years, not known diabetic, tested positive with rapid antigen test or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction admitted to a tertiary care hospital were included in the present prospective observational study. The patients who developed new-onset diabetes during the 3 months follow-up and, the risk factors associated with new-onset diabetes are assessed. Patients with hemoglobin (HbA1c) >6.5% were diagnosed with new-onset diabetes. Results: Total 246 patients were non-diabetics at admission, at 1 week 188 were non-diabetics and 49 were diabetics, and nine were prediabetics. Patients were within the age range of 21–95 years with mean age of 49.46±17.02 years and male predominance (59.76%). Out of 188 non-diabetics, 19 (10.10%) developed new-onset diabetes, and 2 (1.06%) developed new-onset prediabetes after 3 months. Out of 49 diabetics, 19 (38.77%) became non-diabetic, 30 (61.22%) remained diabetic, and out of nine prediabetes 2 (22.22%) developed new-onset diabetes, 5 (55.55%) reversed to non-diabetic, and 2 (22.22%) remained prediabetic after 3 months. In total, from HbA1c at admission and 3 months, 51 subjects had new-onset diabetes (20.73%). Most common risk factors found with occurrence of new-onset diabetes were those on high dose of steroid (P=0.0001), family history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (P=0.001), over weight and obesity (P=0.0001), fungal infection (P=0.0001), and need of oxygen and intensive care unit requirement (P=0.0001). The patient with increased laboratory markers of inflammation such as ferritin, neutrophil leukocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein D-dimer had strong association with occurrence of new-onset diabetes (P=0.0001). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection confers an increased risk for type 2 diabetes. Patients of all ages and genders had an elevated incidence and risk for occurrence of new-onset diabetes. Moreover, it was strongly associated with overweight and obesity, steroid dosage, and its duration, disease severity, positive family history of DM, and increased laboratory markers of inflammation. Hence, particular attention should be paid during the first 3 months after COVID-19 infection and patients need to be under follow-up for blood glucose monitoring.

Introduction: Even though Mortality and Morbidity meetings (M&Ms) are incorporated into postgraduate training programs for imparting the attributes of self-appraisal, audit and quality control, they are not uniformly structured across institutes. This study describes the pattern of conducting M&M at a Medical College in North Karnataka in the context of the perceptions of faculty and residents of our medical college and proposes recommendations. Aim: To generate recommendations for conducting structured M&Ms meetings derived from the perceptions of faculty and residents, and prior feasibility experience at a medical college hospital. Materials and Methods: The present mixed method study was conducted in the Department of General medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, in the month of July 2022. The perceptions of faculty and residents of medicine were obtained by a paper survey. The results of the survey were compiled and analysed by the one of the authors. The responses were matched with the records of M&Ms as conducted in the Department of General Medicine from November 2017 to May 2019. The cases were thematically analysed as deviation from standard protocols of care, multidisciplinary consults, iatrogenic cause of death, unresolved diagnosis and system failure by other authors. Any recommendations recorded were noted. The attendance for such meetings were measured as a surrogate of importance attached. Data was entered in the Microsoft Excel spread sheet. Descriptive statistics were calculated by frequency and proportions for qualitative variables. Results: A total number of 150 participants (65 were faculty including senior residents and the remaining 85 were postgraduate residents) completed the survey. The participants of the survey preferred the presentation by 3rd year residents and junior faculty. While selecting the cases for M&Ms, they preferred systematic selection turn-wise. The participants of the survey considered that while analysing M&M cases; conflicts in multidisciplinary consults, iatrogenic cause of death, human error and deviation from standard protocols of care should be emphasised. During November 2017 to May 2019, a total of 38 M&Ms were held (19 mortality and 19 morbidity meetings). The criterion for mortality case selection was subjective. Five cases were presented during each meeting. Predominant case presentations included interdepartmental transfer issues and procedural lapses. The Department of General Medicine had 30 postgraduate residents and 25 faculty members. The average attendance of residents and faculty was 90% and 78%, respectively. Conclusion: Regularly conducted M&M in a medical college hospital are important in training medical students for audit of medical errors, quality control and appraisal in a safe environment. Prospective selection of cases by recognising potential incidents; and evidence based, structured, uniform conduct of M&Ms by participation of teams involved in healthcare can reduce errors.

Introduction: Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is high in hospitalised and critically ill patients. Most of the cases reported by the developed countries are Hospital Acquired Acute Kidney Injury (HA-AKI). AKI is a major medical complication in the developing world also and is due to predominantly community acquired causes, where the epidemiology differs from that in developed countries. Many studies have reported that Community Acquired Acute Kidney Injury (CA-AKI) and HA-AKI differ in mortality, need for renal replacement and residual renal injury. Aim: To know the difference in need for renal replacement therapy and in-hospital mortality between patients diagnosed with CA-AKI and HA-AKI using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018-December 2018 after obtaining Institutional Ethical Clearance by comparing 50 cases of CA-AKI and 50 cases of HA-AKI admitted by the General Medicine Department as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Serum Creatinine (S.Cr) at admission, after 48 hours and at the time of discharge were measured. Serial urine output measurements were done. Need for dialysis was noted in both the groups. Both groups were compared based on need for dialysis, difference in mortality and residual renal injury at the time of discharge. Chi-square and student t-tests were applied respectively and p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 was used for data entry and analysis. Results: the CA-AKI and HA-AKI groups were comparable in age and gender but differed in some co-morbidities. CA-AKI group had underlying hepatobiliary disorders and Non steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) abuse more often than HA- AKI group. There was a significant reduction in S.Cr over the duration of hospital stay in CA-AKI (mean S.Cr at admission was 4.85 mg/dL, at 48 hours 2.05 mg/dL and at discharge 1.20 mg/dL). S.Cr increased after 48 hours of admission from baseline and declined later in HA-AKI but did not reach baseline in many patients in comparison to CA-AKI group (mean S.Cr at admission was 1.10 mg/dL, at 48 hours 2.38 mg/dL, at discharge 1.57 mg/dL). The highest stage of AKI was stage 3 in CA-AKI group (22 vs 11 of HA-AKI). HA-AKI group had more number of patients in stage 2 AKI (26 vs 18 of CA-AKI). There was no significant difference in mortality and requirement of haemodialysis between CA-AKI and HA-AKI groups. Conclusion: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of mortality and need for renal replacement therapy but there was significant residual renal injury in HA-AKI group.