Background:As artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in research increase and AI becomes more integrated into medicine, there is a need to understand perspectives from members of the Canadian public and medical community. The aim of this project was to investigate current perspectives on ethical issues surrounding AI in health care. Methods:In this qualitative study, adult patients with meningioma and their caregivers were recruited consecutively (August 2018-February 2019) from a neurosurgical clinic in Toronto. Health care providers caring for these patients were recruited through snowball sampling. Based on a nonsystematic literature search, we constructed 3 vignettes that sought participants' views on hypothetical issues surrounding potential AI applications in health care. The vignettes were presented to participants in interviews, which lasted 15-45 minutes. Responses were transcribed and coded for concepts, frequency of response types and larger concepts emerging from the interview. Results:We interviewed 30 participants: 18 patients, 7 caregivers and 5 health care providers. For each question, a variable number of responses were recorded. The majority of participants endorsed nonconsented use of health data but advocated for disclosure and transparency. Few patients and caregivers felt that allocation of health resources should be done via computerized output, and a majority stated that it was inappropriate to delegate such decisions to a computer. Almost all participants felt that selling health data should be prohibited, and a minority stated that less privacy is acceptable for the goal of improving health. Certain caveats were identified, including the desire for deidentification of data and use within trusted institutions.Interpretation: In this preliminary study, patients and caregivers reported a mixture of hopefulness and concern around the use of AI in health care research, whereas providers were generally more skeptical. These findings provide a point of departure for institutions adopting health AI solutions to consider the ethical implications of this work by understanding stakeholders' perspectives. Abstract Research OPEN CMAJ OPEN, 8(1) E91 Affiliations: Division of Neurosurgery (McCradden,
Background/Aims: Evolving surgical practice has placed increasing pressures on surgical outpatient clinics. This article provides a prospective evaluation of a rapid-access coloproctology clinic over a 3-year period. Methods: Primary care physicians (PCP) were circulated details of the clinic, and invited to refer any patient presenting with colorectal or anorectal symptoms, or with a family history of bowel cancer wishing advice about screening. Data were collected prospectively and patients and the referring PCPs were invited to complete a self-administered structured questionnaire. Results: In all, 3,119 patients were referred, the main indications being rectal bleeding (67%), abdominal pain (16%) and change in bowel habit (15%). The average time interval between PCP visit and specialist consultation was 2 days and neoplastic disease was detected in 7.1% of patients. 70% of patients with haemorrhoids and 39% of those with other minor diseases were discharged back to their PCPs after definitive treatment at the time of their visit to the clinic. The majority of PCPs and patients expressed satisfaction with the service as evidenced by the returned questionnaires. Conclusion: These data show that a more universal implementation of such clinics may result in improved care of colorectal disease and considerable savings of outpatient time and resources.
Background Lymphatic complications are common in patients with Fontan circulation. Three-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession (3D bSSFP) angiography by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely used for cardiovascular anatomical assessment. We sought to determine the frequency of thoracic duct (TD) visualization using 3D bSSFP images and assess whether TD characteristics are associated with clinical outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients with Fontan circulation who underwent CMR. Frequency matching of age at CMR was used to construct a comparison group of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). TD characteristics included maximum diameter and a qualitative assessment of tortuosity. Clinical outcomes included protein-losing enteropathy (PLE), plastic bronchitis, listing for heart transplantation, and death. A composite outcome was defined as presence of any of these events. Results The study included 189 Fontan patients (median age 16.1 years, IQR 11.0–23.2 years) and 36 rTOF patients (median age 15.7 years, IQR 11.1–23.7 years). The TD diameter was larger (median 2.50 vs. 1.95 mm, p = 0.002) and more often well visualized (65% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) in Fontan patients vs. rTOF patients. TD dimension increased mildly with age in Fontan patients, R = 0.19, p = 0.01. In Fontan patients, the TD diameter was larger in those with PLE vs. without PLE (age-adjusted mean 4.11 vs. 2.72, p = 0.005), and was more tortuous in those with NYHA class ≥ II vs. class I (moderate or greater tortuosity 75% vs. 28.5%, p = 0.02). Larger TD diameter was associated with a lower ventricular ejection fraction that was independent of age (partial correlation = − 0.22, p = 0.02). More tortuous TDs had a higher end-systolic volume (mean 70.0 mL/m2 vs. 57.3 mL/m2, p = 0.03), lower creatinine (mean 0.61 mg/dL vs. 0.70 mg/dL, p = 0.04), and a higher absolute lymphocyte count (mean 1.80 K cells/µL vs. 0.76 K cells/µL, p = 0.003). The composite outcome was present in 6% of Fontan patients and was not associated with TD diameter (p = 0.50) or tortuosity (p = 0.09). Conclusions The TD is well visualized in two-thirds of patients with Fontan circulation on 3D-bSSFP images. Larger TD diameter is associated with PLE and increased TD tortuosity is associated with an NYHA class ≥ II.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.