Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of pregnancy. Prompt and aggressive resuscitative strategies are crucial in promoting survivability. We present a case of AFE resulting in cardiopulmonary collapse and subsequent cardiac arrest where we were able to safely deliver the baby and resuscitate the mother with veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella CP—a novel combination known as ECPELLA. We discuss the implications of this approach as a more efficacious strategy in resuscitating AFE‐induced cardiogenic shock and arrest.
Background In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the vast majority of thrombi originate in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Thus, occluding the LAA significantly reduces one’s risk for developing an ischemic stroke. To date, many various surgical methodologies in LAA occlusion (LAAO)/exclusion have been studied and utilized. Unfortunately, patients are often left with incomplete closure of their LAA, leaving behind residual lobes that continue to allow thrombus formations. With the recent rise in percutaneous approaches and devices such as the WATCHMAN FLX, there has been proven success rates in achieving total closure of the LAA. Reports and investigations regarding the utilization of the WATCHMAN FLX devices in patients with surgically incomplete LAAO remains limited. Case Summary We present three cases of patients who had previously undergone surgical exclusion of the LAA yet unfortunately were left with residual LAA that continued to place them at high risk for an ischemic stroke. Percutaneous LAA occlusion with the WATCHMAN FLX was utilized to successfully achieve complete sealing of the residual lobes in failed LAA surgical closures. Discussion Our multicenter case series elucidates that an increased risk of stroke due to surgical LAAO failure is a real-world possibility that is likely to be encountered in clinical practice. We demonstrate in this series how the WATCHMAN FLX may provide a feasible and safe method to supplement a surgically incomplete LAAO to allow for improved ischemic stroke and systemic embolization risk reduction.
Background: Rapid administration of appropriately indicated antibiotics is crucial in septic patients. Sepsis data supports that there is a higher risk of mortality for each hour delay from triage to antibiotic therapy, as well as for inappropriate antibiotic selection. There are a variety of rapid microbial detection systems, such as VERIGENE®, used in acute care facilities to rapidly detect bacteremia and identify resistance markers. Our study investigates the usefulness of VERIGENE® assays in accurately detecting Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens when compared to traditional blood culture analysis systems, such as VITEK®. Methods: 819 Gram-positive and 373 Gram-negative blood samples were collected and tested using both VERIGENE® and VITEK®. Statistical tests were two-tailed and observations were defined as statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05. Results: VERIGENE® detected a pathogen in 816/819 (99.6%) samples of the Gram-positive blood cultures and 367/373 (98.3%) samples of the Gram-negatives compared to 805/819 (98.3%) and 367/373 (98.4%), respectively, using VITEK®. Gram-positive cultures had a sensitivity of 99.5% and a specificity of 27.3% (PPV 99.0%, NPV 42.9%, 98.7% accuracy) with VERIGENE analysis. Gram-negatives had a sensitivity of 99.2% and a specificity of 20.0% (PPV 98.9%, NPV 25.0%, 98.4% accuracy). Conclusions: Although statistically insignificant (P = 0.25), VERIGENE® was 1.3% more likely to identify Gram-positive bacteria when compared to conventional methods. Overall, we concluded that VERIGENE® assays are valuable in their ability to rapidly detect microorganisms and resistance markers, given their high sensitivities. This allows for select targeted therapy in patients with sepsis and can ultimately reduce mortality rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.