BackgroundTotal mastectomy and axillary dissection is a common procedure for breast cancer patients in our institution. Seroma is common. This study aimed to compare the quilting suture and conventional closure in prevention of seroma after total mastectomy and axillary dissection.MethodsThis randomized comparative study was carried out from January 2018 to June 2019 in Yangon General Hospital. One hundred and forty patients (70 conventional and 70 quilting) were included. For quilting group, customized strategically placed interrupted alternate sutures were placed 2–3 cm apart with 3/0 vicryl sutures between skin flap and pectoral muscle.ResultsAge, body mass index and tumour diameter were comparable between the groups. The mean duration of operation was 111.44 ± 7.045 min in conventional and 124.5 ± 6.39 min in quilting (P = 0.0001). The mean drain output for conventional group was not significantly different from quilting group. In quilting, some area developed dimpling which resolved within a week. A total of 21 (30%) patients in the conventional group and 10 patients (14.3%) in the quilting group developed seroma (P = 0.041). The mean frequency and amount of seroma aspiration were significantly lower in the quilting group. Shoulder movement limitation and analgesia use showed no significant difference.ConclusionAlthough total amount of drain output, duration of drain, hospital stay and post‐operative complications were not different, the incidence of seroma was significantly lower in quilting group. Seroma is treated with more ease in the quilting group as the frequency and amount of aspiration were lower and less frequent follow‐up visits were required. Quilting can reduce the seroma incidence in total mastectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer patients.
Lymphatic filariasis is common in Myanmar. Filariasis of breast is rare. This is a case report of filariasis presenting as breast lump.
Background: Breast cancer is the commonest malignancy in women of Myanmar. Mastectomy is one of the main surgical treatments of breast cancer. Postoperative seroma is a common complication after mastectomy, which increases chances of infection, delays wound healing, causes flap necrosis, persistent pain, and dehiscence of the wound and thus increases the convalescence period. This study aimed to compare the seroma formation between single drainage and double drainage after total mastectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer patients.Methods: One-year hospital based comparative study was conducted at general surgical wards of Yangon General Hospital where 150 patients were included. Patients were randomized into two groups: 75 patients were with single drain into axilla and another 75 patients were with double drains (one into axilla and one into mastectomy bed). Drainage volume was recorded daily and summed up into total amount. The drain was removed when output was <30ml in 24 hours for two consecutive days. Follow-up visits were made at second, third and fourth weeks to check for seroma.Results: Mean age was 48.66 years in the single drain group and 51.22 years in the double drain group. Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) were 28.20kg/m2 in the first group and 28.79kg/m2 in the second. Statistically significant differences were not seen between the groups regarding total drain amount (315.13ml and 325.47ml, P=0.38). Duration of drains in the single group remained significantly shorter than in the double group (5.78 days and 6.38 days, P=0.002). Seroma during immediate postoperative period was seen in 29.3% and 36%, respectively (P=0.38). For one month follow-up, seroma was developed in 3 patients (4%) from each group. Statistically significant differences were not observed regarding the number of aspiration and the amount of aspiration between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both single and double drain methods had almost similar rates of seroma formation after total mastectomy and axillary dissection. But single drain is recommended to reduce patients’ discomfort with less morbidity and cost.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.