No abstract

No abstract

The recent development of in vitro hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA replication systems has provided useful tools for studying the intracellular anti-HCV activity of ribavirin. Ribavirin has been shown to: (1) induce "error catastrophe" in poliovirus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6895-6900), (2) be a pseudo-substrate of the HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) in vitro, J. Biol. Chem. 276, 46094-46098), and (3) increase mutations in HCV RNA in the binary T7 polymerase/HCV cDNA replication system, J. Virol. 76, 8505-8517). These findings have led to the hypothesis that ribavirin may also induce error catastrophe in HCV. However, the functional relevance of ribavirin-induced HCV RNA mutagenesis is unclear. By use of a colony formation assay, in which RNA is isolated from the HCV subgenomic replicon system following treatment, the impact of ribavirin, inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibitors, and the combination was assessed. Ribavirin reduced HCV replicon colony-forming efficiency (CFE) in a dose-dependent fashion, suggesting that ribavirin may be misincorporated into replicon RNA and result in an anti-replicon effect analogous to error catastrophe. This effect was markedly suppressed by addition of exogenous guanosine. Combination treatment with ribavirin and mycophenolic acid (MPA) or VX-497, both potent, nonnucleoside IMPDH inhibitors, led to a greatly enhanced anti-replicon effect. This enhancement was reversed by inclusion of guanosine with the treatment. In contrast, MPA or VX-497 alone had only marginal effects on both the quantity and quality (CFE) of replicon RNA, suggesting that although IMPDH inhibition is an important contributing factor to the overall ribavirin anti-HCV replicon activity, IMPDH inhibition by itself is not sufficient to exert an anti-HCV effect. Sequencing data targeting the neo gene segment of the HCV replicon indicated that ribavirin together with MPA or VX-497 increased the replicon error rate by about two-fold. Taken together these results further suggest that lethal mutagenesis may be an effective anti-HCV strategy. The colony formation assay provides a useful tool for evaluating mutagenic nucleoside analogs for HCV therapy. Finally, the data from combination treatment indicate potential therapeutic value for an enhanced anti-HCV effect when using ribavirin in combination with IMPDH inhibition.

EBNA2 is essential for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) immortalization of B lymphocytes. EBNA2 functions as a transcriptional activator and targets responsive promoters through interaction with the cellular DNA binding protein CBF1. We have examined the mechanism whereby EBNA2 overcomes CBF1-mediated transcriptional repression. A yeast two-hybrid screen performed using CBF1 as the bait identified a protein, SKIP, which had not previously been recognized as a CBF1-associated protein. Protein-protein interaction assays demonstrated contacts between SKIP and the SMRT, CIR, Sin3A, and HDAC2 proteins of the CBF1 corepressor complex. Interestingly, EBNA2 also interacted with SKIP in glutathione S-transferase affinity and mammalian twohybrid assays and colocalized with SKIP in immunofluorescence assays. Interaction with SKIP was not affected by mutation of EBNA2 conserved region 6, the CBF1 interaction region, but was abolished by mutation of conserved region 5. Mutation of conserved region 5 also severely impaired EBNA2 activation of a reporter containing CBF1 binding sites. Thus, interaction with both CBF1 and SKIP is necessary for efficient promoter activation by EBNA2. A model is presented in which EBNA2 competes with the SMRT-corepressor complex for contacts on SKIP and CBF1.The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded latency protein EBNA2 is a nuclear transcriptional activator that is essential for EBV-induced B-cell transformation (27). EBNA2 contributes to immortalization by regulating EBV latency gene expression and by activating expression of cellular genes. EBNA2 regulates expression of the EBV latency Cp promoter that drives expression of the EBNA family of nuclear proteins in type III latency and also contributes to the positive regulation of the LMP2A, LMP2B, and LMP1 promoters (21,36,46,51,62). EBNA2 does not bind to DNA directly but rather is targeted to responsive promoters through interactions with cellular DNA binding proteins. Targeting through Pu.1 (Spi1) has been described for the LMP1 promoter (22, 30), while CBF1 (RBP-J, RBP-2N, J) has been identified as the targeting partner for the viral Cp, LMP2A, and divergent LMP1 and LMP2B promoters (9,14,35,54,63). EBNA2 regulates its own expression, and deletion of the region containing the CBF1 binding site from Cp biases promoter usage toward Wp (60). A number of cellular genes, such as those encoding CD23, interleukins, and beta interferon that respond to EBNA2 also have CBF1 binding sites in their promoters (24,28,34,56). However, there are some responsive genes, such as the cyclin D2 gene (26, 43), for which the mechanism of activation is unknown. These genes may be activated as part of a downstream response cascade, or additional EBNA2 targeting mechanisms may exist. Optimal activation by EBNA2 also requires cooperation with other transcription factors. The Cp EBNA2-responsive element contains a CBF2 binding site adjacent to the CBF1 binding site, and the CBF2 site contributes to EBNA2 responsiveness (7,21,35,40). The LMP1 promoter is complexly regulated with bo...

The CSL family protein CBF1 is a nuclear mediator of Notch signaling and has been predicted to contain an N-terminal nuclear localization signal in exon 4. Surprisingly, we found that CBF1 carrying mutations at codon 233 or 249 within exon 7 was restricted to the cytoplasm. In mammalian and yeast two-hybrid assays, these mutations were also associated with a loss of CBF1-mediated transcriptional repression and a severely impaired interaction with the corepressors SMRT and CIR. Overexpression of SMRT rescued the ability of mutant CBF1 to target to the nucleus of transfected cells and similarly rescued nuclear targeting of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-CBF1 exons 6 to 9 CBF1(6-9)carrying the codon 233 or 249 mutations. Carboxy-terminally truncated SMRT with amino acids (aa) 1291 to 1495 deleted was unable to rescue the nuclear targeting of mutant EGFP-CBF1(6-9). In yeast two-hybrid assays, the SMRT aa 1291 to 1495 domain interacted with SKIP and SMRT aa 1291 to 1495 colocalized with SKIP within the nuclei of cotransfected cells. Comparison of the intracellular localization of CBF1(6-9) with that of CBF1(5-9) further supported the suggestion that nuclear targeting of CBF1 is dependent on the formation of a CBF1-SMRT-SKIP corepressor complex. These observations suggest that nuclear targeting of CBF1 is itself a component of CBF1-mediated gene regulation and that in the absence of signaling, CBF1 enters the nucleus precommitted to a transcriptional repression function. The activators NotchIC (the intracellular domain of Notch) and Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2 also mediated nuclear targeting of mutant CBF1, consistent with the competition model for activator versus corepressor binding to CBF1.