The aim of the study was to assess the effect of a comprehensive prophylactic regimen in reducing the incidence of white spot lesions (WSL) and caries during orthodontic treatment. Eighty consecutive patients, scheduled for fixed appliance treatment in both jaws were compared with a non-orthodontic matched-control group. The oral hygiene regimen consisted of brushing two to three times daily, flossing, fluoride rinse, and plaque disclosing tablets. Patients were requested to avoid carbonated soft drinks/acidic juices and candies. The WSL index of Gorelick et al. (Gorelick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J 1982 Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 93-98) was used. Caries were scored according to Amarante et al. (Amarante E, Raadal M, Espelid I 1998 Impact of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dental caries in Norwegian children aged 5, 12 and 18 years. Community Dental Oral Epidemiology 26: 87-94). We collected data from all finished cases. It comprised 40 subjects in the orthodontic group (mean age: 13.6 years, range: 12-16 years) and 40 matched controls. The average treatment time was 18 months (range: 9-25 months). The mean increase in WSL index in the orthodontic group was 1.9 and 0.4 in the control group (P = 0.001). The mean increase in dentine caries was 0.5 lesions and 0.7 lesions in the in the orthodontic group and control group, respectively (P = 0.62). Twenty-three per cent of treated patients showed good compliance, 68 per cent moderate compliance, and 9 per cent poor compliance. The mean increase in WSL was 1.0, 1.4, and 3.3 in the good, moderate, and poor compliance group, respectively (P = 0.155). Orthodontically treated patients have significantly higher risk for developing WSL than untreated patients, while there is no difference with respect to development of new dentinal caries lesions. This study showed that a possible relationship between compliance and WSL development existed.

The present results show that root resorption of maxillary lateral incisors was common in patients referred to CBCT imaging due to maxillary canine eruption disturbances. Although significantly more frequent in patients with ectopically erupting canines, lateral incisor resorption was also found in association with approximately every third of the normally erupting canines. The best predictor for root resorption seemed to be location of the canine mesial in relation to the midline of the lateral incisor root.

This study shows that early HG treatment in children with Angle Class II occlusion may change the eruption pattern of permanent maxillary canines to a more vertical direction. This change appears to be related to space conditions in the maxillary arch, especially in the intercanine region, with more effect in children with spaced dental arches than in children with crowded dental arches.

Objectives To compare the impact of primary canine and primary first molar extractions with extractions of only the primary canine regarding correction of palatally displaced canines (PDCs). Materials and Methods Thirty-two children aged 9.5–13.5 years with 48 PDCs were randomly allocated to either the double-extraction group (DEG) or single-extraction group (SEG). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at baseline and at 6-month intervals until the canine emerged or orthodontic treatment was started. Outcome measures were: emergence of maxillary canine (yes/no), emergence of maxillary canine into a favorable position (yes/no), and maxillary canine positional change (angulation and sector). Factors influencing PDC emergence were analyzed using logistic regression. Results In the DEG, 64% (16/25) of canines emerged into the oral cavity vs 78% (18/23) in the SEG (P = .283). Favorable PDC position at trial end was seen in 64% (16/25) of the DEG vs 57% (13/23) of the SEG (P = .600). Significant distal movement of PDCs was recorded in the DEG and SEG, though no significant difference was observed between groups. Significant predictors of canine emergence were initial canine angulation (Angle A) (P = .008) and space conditions at T0 (P = .030). Conclusions Double or single primary tooth extraction procedures are equivalent in supporting PDC eruption into the oral cavity and into a favorable position in the dental arch. Initial canine angulation and space assessments may be used as predictors of successful PDC eruption.