Downloaded fromwhen approaching the HOMO or LUMO resonance of the molecular wire (28). The increased conductance at higher bias voltages then compensates for the molecular wire length increase in Fig. 4B (a factor of 40 is not sufficient for the achieved current increase). Thus, such a setup allows the determination of the small conductance (8.6 × 10 -13 S) of a single and the same molecular wire with 20 nm length (the conductance at small bias voltages cannot be measured over such a large distance, due to the extremely low current-below the detection limit-passing through the polymer in this case). In this regard, it would be interesting to prepare and study conjugated polymers with smaller HOMO-LUMO gaps. Such molecular wires should exhibit higher conductances and allow charge transport to be determined over even larger distances. Hominin footprints offer evidence about gait and foot shape, but their scarcity, combined with an inadequate hominin fossil record, hampers research on the evolution of the human gait. Here, we report hominin footprints in two sedimentary layers dated at 1.51 to 1.53 million years ago (Ma) at Ileret, Kenya, providing the oldest evidence of an essentially modern human-like foot anatomy, with a relatively adducted hallux, medial longitudinal arch, and medial weight transfer before push-off. The size of the Ileret footprints is consistent with stature and body mass estimates for Homo ergaster/erectus, and these prints are also morphologically distinct from the 3.75-millionyear-old footprints at Laetoli, Tanzania. The Ileret prints show that by 1.5 Ma, hominins had evolved an essentially modern human foot function and style of bipedal locomotion. Bipedalism is a key human adaptation that appears in the fossil record by 6 million years ago (Ma) (1). Considerable debate continues over when and in what context a modern human-like form of bipedalism evolved, because of a fragmentary record and disagreements over the functional interpretations of existing fossils and footprints (2-7). Modern human footprints reflect the specialized anatomy and function of the human foot, which is characterized by a fully adducted hallux, a large and robust calcaneus and tarsal region, a pronounced medial longitudinal arch, and short toes (2). Footprints reflect the pressure distribution as the foot makes contact with the substrate, but also the sediment's geomechanical properties (8). During normal walking, the weight-bearing foot undergoes a highly stereotypical movement and pressure distribution pattern in which the heel contacts the ground first, making a relatively deep impression on the substrate. This is followed by contact with the lateral side of the foot and metatarsal heads, after which weight transfers to the ball of the foot with peak pressure under the medial metatarsal heads, and finally ending with toe-off pressure under the hallux (9, 10). As a consequence, the deepest part of a footprint often occurs beneath the first and second metatarsal heads, that along with a deep hallucal impression cor...

No abstract

No abstract

Several studies on craniofacial morphology showed that most Paleoindians, who were the first settlers of the New World, clearly differ from modern Amerindians and East Asians, their supposed descendants and sister group, respectively. Here we present new evidence supporting this view from the Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene horizon from Mexico, as well as from the most complete set of dated Paleoindian remains. We analyzed the phenotypic resemblance of early Mexicans with other South Paleoamerican and modern human series. Two independent approaches to the data were used. In the first case, individual specimens were tested for morphological similarity with a set of modern reference samples. In the second analysis, Mexican specimens were treated as a sample in order to compute minimum genetic distances. Results from both approaches tend to associate early Mexican skulls with Paleoindians from Brazil, an Archaic sample from Colombia, and several circum-Pacific populations. These results give support to a model in which morphologically generalized groups of non-Northeast Asian descent (the so-called Paleoamericans) entered the continent first, and then dispersed from North to South America through Central America. The large geographic dispersal of Paleoamericans, and their presence in Mexico in the Early Holocene, raise new issues about the continent's settlement scenario.

No abstract