No abstract

Central diabetes insipidus (CDI) is a rare hypothalamus-pituitary disease due to the deficiency of arginine vasopressin (AVP) synthesis from the hypothalamus and/or secretion from the neurohypophysis. The etiology of CDI is unknown in over one third of cases, classified as idiopathic CDI. The aim of this study was 2-fold: 1) to evaluate the occurrence of circulating autoantibodies to AVP-secreting cells (AVPcAb), and 2) to correlate it to clinical (sex, age of disease onset, disease duration, and degree), immunological (clinical history of autoimmune diseases and presence of related organ-specific autoantibodies), and radiological features (neurohypophyseal bright spot, pituitary stalk thickening, and empty sella) in a large cohort of patients with apparently idiopathic CDI or CDI of known etiology. To this purpose, 150 patients with CDI were studied: 64 idiopathic, 6 familial, 12 associated to granulomatous diseases, and 68 secondary to cranial trauma, tumor, or surgery. AVPcAb were measured by an indirect immunofluorescence method. AVPcAb were found in 23.3% of CDI patients: 21 idiopathic (32.8%) and 14 nonidiopathic (16.3%; chi(2) = 13.1; P < 0.001). AVPcAb were independently associated with age less than 30 yr at disease onset (P = 0.001) in patients with idiopathic CDI and with history of autoimmune diseases (P = 0.006 and P = 0.02, respectively) and radiological evidence of pituitary stalk thickening (P = 0.02 and P = 0.003, respectively) in both idiopathic and nonidiopathic CDI. The likelihood of autoimmunity in one patient with apparently idiopathic CDI with age of disease onset less than 30 yr was 53%, it increased to 91% when history of autoimmune diseases was associated and to 99% when pituitary stalk thickening was further associated. In conclusion, autoimmunity is associated with one third of patients with apparently idiopathic CDI, which should therefore be classified as autoimmune CDI. Autoimmune CDI is highly likely in young patients with a clinical history of autoimmune diseases and radiological evidence of pituitary stalk thickening. Conversely, autoimmunity probably represents an epiphenomenon in patients with nonidiopathic CDI.

The role of antipituitary antibodies (APA) in autoimmune pituitary diseases still needs to be clarified. The aim of this study was 2-fold: first, to investigate the presence of APA in adults with idiopathic or acquired GH deficiency (GHD) and in adults with autoimmune endocrine diseases; and second, to evaluate whether in autoimmune endocrine patients APA titer is correlated to the pituitary function and particularly to GH secretion. We studied 12 adults with isolated and apparently idiopathic GHD who were treated with recombinant GH in childhood (group 1a), 14 patients with adult GHD secondary to surgery for pituitary and parasellar tumors (group 1b), and 180 patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases (group 2). APA were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence. In all APA-positive patients and in 20 APA-negative patients of group 2, GH secretion was investigated by testing its response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (insulin tolerance test) and, when impaired, also to arginine. APA were found (at high titers) in 4 of 12 patients of group 1a (33.3%) but were absent in all patients in group 1b. APA were also found in 40 of 180 patients of group 2 (22.2%), 35 of them at low titers (group 2a) and 5 at high titers (group 2b). Twenty of the 140 autoimmune endocrine APA-negative patients studied (group 2c) and all APA-positive patients at low titers (group 2a) had normal pituitary function. Conversely, all APA-positive patients at high titers (groups 1a and 2b) had a severe isolated GHD. An inverse correlation between APA titers and GH peak serum response to insulin tolerance test in autoimmune endocrine patients was observed. Our results suggest that APA, when detected at high titers, may be considered a good diagnostic tool to highlight the possible occurrence of GHD in adults with autoimmune endocrine diseases. Moreover, they may indicate an autoimmune pituitary involvement in adults with apparently idiopathic GHD, suggesting that the prevalence of autoimmune GHD is much higher than that so far considered.

Objective In order to investigate whether somatotrophs are the target of antipituitary antibodies (APA) in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), we studied the sera of 37 APA positive patients. Patients Patients were grouped as follows: nine patients with APA at high titre (> 1 : 8) affected by apparently idiopathic GHD; four of them (group 1a) with isolated GHD diagnosed during childhood and five with GHD diagnosed during adulthood associated with autoimmune endocrine diseases (group 1b), and 28 patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases without pituitary impairment, previously found positive for APA at low titre (1 : 8, group 2). Measurements APA were evaluated by a four-layer double indirect immunofluorescence technique. Results In group 1a patients, APA immunostained exclusively GH-producing cells. In group 1b patients, APA were directed not only to GH-but also to other pituitary hormone-producing cells. In group 2 patients, APA were directed selectively to PRL-producing cells and rarely to some GH-producing cells. Conclusions In the present study, we demonstrated that GH-secreting cells are the target of the autoimmune reaction in autoimmune GHD and that the immunostaining of only the somatotrophs is typical of isolated GHD. In contrast, the finding of diffuse staining of APA indicates the need to search for other autoimmune diseases. Finally, the presence of APA at low titre directed against PRL-secreting cells in patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases in the absence of pituitary impairment, seems to be only a nonspecific marker of pituitary autoimmunity. A longitudinal study would be useful to clarify the relationship between the different pituitary cell involvement and the natural history of pituitary dysfunction in autoimmune hypophysitis.