This work presents the investigation of the efficiency of different prestressing devices as a rehabilitation measure for the seismic risk mitigation of historical masonry towers. As a first phase, the seismic vulnerability of theoretical masonry towers was assessed by means of numerical models validated with information from the literature, observed damage and behavior of these structures due to passed earthquakes (crack pattern and failure mechanisms), and mainly taking into account the engineering experience. Afterwards, the validated models were rehabilitated with different prestressing devices; analyzing the results and concluding which device or the combination of them improved in a better way the seismic performance of the masonry towers. Finally, the methodology will be applied in two historical masonry towers located in seismic areas; the medieval tower “Torre Grossa” of San Gimignano, Italy, and one of the bell towers of the Cathedral of Colima, Mexico.
The German PSA Guideline and its technical documents on PSA methods and data require probabilistic safety analyses (PSA) to be carried out in the frame of safety reviews for nuclear power plants. Since 2005 this also includes a seismic PSA (SPSA) for sites with design earthquake intensities exceeding the value VII (MSK-64/EMS-98). It is shown how the plant model of PSA Level 1 for internal events can be extended on the level of fault tree basic events to get a quantifiable seismic plant model. A two-step screening procedure can be applied to derive the seismic equipment list (SEL) and a list of all possibly seismic-induced dependent equipment failures. The screening procedure is supported by a database. The database keeps at hand all the data and information to extend the plant model of PSA Level 1 in a proper manner.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.